The ICF

Eadie, Tanya L.

doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2003/065)

Cited by 61 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Interference in participation may come from physical impairments limiting communication abilities, but it may also come from many other sources interacting with the communication disorder such as other health symptoms (and consequences of treatment such as medication or radiation effects), environmental conditions including communication partners, or even a client’s personal outlook (personal priorities or coping strategies) (Baylor, Burns et al, 2011; Becker et al, 2011; Eadie, 2003; Hartelius, Elmberg, Holm, Lovberg, & Nikolaidis, 2008; Howe, 2008; Howe, Worrall, & Hickson, 2008a, 2008b; Threats, 2007; Whitehill, Ma, & Tse, 2010). After administering the CPIB, clinicians must engage clients in deeper interviews about the situations in which they experience interference and what factors they feel contribute to participation restrictions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB): Item Bank Calibration and Development of a Disorder-Generic Short Form

Baylor

Yorkston

Eadie

et al. 2013

J Speech Lang Hear Res

195

246

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this study was to calibrate the items for the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) using Item Response Theory (IRT). One overriding objective was to examine if the IRT item parameters would be consistent across different diagnostic groups, thereby allowing creation of a disorder-generic instrument. The intended outcomes were the final item bank and a short form ready for clinical and research applications. Methods Self-report data were collected from 701 individuals representing four diagnoses: multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and head and neck cancer. Participants completed the CPIB and additional self-report questionnaires. CPIB data were analyzed using the IRT Graded Response Model (GRM). Results The initial set of 94 candidate CPIB items were reduced to an item bank of 46 items demonstrating unidimensionality, local independence, good item fit, and good measurement precision. Differential item function (DIF) analyses detected no meaningful differences across diagnostic groups. A 10-item, disorder-generic short form was generated. Conclusions The CPIB provides speech-language pathologists with a unidimensional, self-report outcomes measurement instrument dedicated to the construct of communicative participation. This instrument may be useful to clinicians and researchers wanting to implement measures of communicative participation in their work.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB): Item Bank Calibration and Development of a Disorder-Generic Short Form

Baylor

Yorkston

Eadie

et al. 2013

J Speech Lang Hear Res

195

246

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, the ICF has been applied to laryngectomy (Eadie, 2003), aphasia (Simmons-Mackie & Kagan, 2007), dysarthria (Dykstra, Hakel, & Adam, 2007), stuttering (Yaruss, 2007), and voice disorders (Ma, Yiu, & Abbott, 2007) among others. When examining communication disorders within the ICF framework, two trends are evident.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Qualitative Study of Interference With Communicative Participation Across Communication Disorders in Adults

Baylor

Burns

Eadie

et al. 2011

Am J Speech Lang Pathol

116

126

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To explore the similarities and differences in self-reported restrictions in communicative participation across different communication disorders in community-dwelling adults. Methods Interviews were conducted with 44 adults representing seven different medical conditions: spasmodic dysphonia, multiple sclerosis, stroke, stuttering, Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and laryngectomy. This paper represents a secondary analysis of qualitative data collected in cognitive interviews during development of the Communicative Participation Item Bank. The data were analyzed to identify themes in participants’ experiences related to communicative participation. Results Participants described many situations in which they experienced interference in communicative participation. Two themes emerged from the data. The first theme was Interference is both “functional” and “emotional” in which participants defined interference as limitations in accomplishing tasks and emotional consequences. The second theme was “It depends” - Sources of interference in which participants described many variables that contribute to interference in participation. Participants had limited control of some variables such as symptoms and environmental contexts, but personal decisions and priorities also influenced participation. Conclusions Despite different impairments and activity limitations, participants described similar communicative participation restrictions. These similarities may have theoretical and clinical implications in terms of how we assess, treat and study the participation restrictions associated with communication disorders.

show abstract

“…For example, patient-reported outcomes (e.g., health- or voice-related quality of life measures) are important indicators of success post-laryngectomy (Eadie, 2003), and complement more traditional measurements of the speech signal, such as evaluation of speech intelligibility, acoustic parameters of the speech signal, and auditory-perceptual judgments of speech and voice quality. However, because individual measures do not always directly relate to one another, a multidimensional approach to evaluation is ideal (Eadie, 2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%