The Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB): Item Bank Calibration and Development of a Disorder-Generic Short Form

Baylor, Carolyn; Yorkston, Kathryn M.; Eadie, Tanya L.; Kim, Jiseon; Chung, Hyewon; Amtmann, Dagmar

doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0140)

Cited by 196 publications

(261 citation statements)

References 65 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

253

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This tool requires further clinical validation to determine whether its use is feasible in everyday clinical contexts. It is unknown whether the 10-item disorder short form (Baylor et al, 2013) could be utilized.…”

Section: Theme 4: Adaptations As a Results Of Communication Changesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Communication changes following non-glottic head and neck cancer management: The perspectives of survivors and carers

Nund¹,

Rumbach²,

Debattista³

et al. 2015

International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Theme 4: Adaptations As a Results Of Communication Changesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Communication changes following non-glottic head and neck cancer management: The perspectives of survivors and carers

Nund¹,

Rumbach²,

Debattista³

et al. 2015

International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The CPIB item bank consists of 46 items. One 10-item short form is currently available for clinical and research use (Baylor et al, 2013). That short form has been validated for adults with speech and language disorders (Baylor et al, 2016(Baylor et al, , 2013.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One 10-item short form is currently available for clinical and research use (Baylor et al, 2013). That short form has been validated for adults with speech and language disorders (Baylor et al, 2016(Baylor et al, , 2013. Future goals for CPIB development include computerized adaptive testing (Cook, O'Malley, & Roddey, 2005).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The CPIB is a patient-reported instrument designed to measure the extent to which communication disorders interfere with participation in a wide range of daily conversational situations (Baylor et al, 2013;Baylor, Yorkston, Eadie, Miller, & Amtmann, 2009;Yorkston et al, 2008). One of the guiding principles in the development of the CPIB was that it would be a unidimensional instrument focusing on the construct of communicative participation.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many surveys do not ask about a wide range of environments and situations in which participation in communication occurs, thus giving only a partial window into participation restrictions associated with hearing loss. Last, although many patient-reported outcomes in audiology exist, few are used consistently between studies or clinicians, indicating a lack of consensus in the field as to which ones are most important (Granberg, Dahlström, Möller, Kähäri, & Danermark, 2014).The CPIB is a patient-reported instrument designed to measure the extent to which communication disorders interfere with participation in a wide range of daily conversational situations (Baylor et al, 2013;Baylor, Yorkston, Eadie, Miller, & Amtmann, 2009;Yorkston et al, 2008). One of the guiding principles in the development of the CPIB was that it would be a unidimensional instrument focusing on the construct of communicative participation.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Exploring the Relevance of Items in the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) for Individuals With Hearing Loss

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) was developed to evaluate participation restrictions in communication situations for individuals with speech and language disorders. This study evaluated the potential relevance of CPIB items for individuals with hearing loss. Method: Cognitive interviews were conducted with 17 adults with a range of treated and untreated hearing loss, who responded to 46 items. Interviews were continued until saturation was reached and prevalent trends emerged. A focus group was also conducted with 3 experienced audiologists to seek their views on the CPIB. Analysis of data included qualitative and quantitative approaches.Results: The majority of the items were applicable to individuals with hearing loss; however, 12 items were identified as potentially not relevant. This was largely attributed to the items' focus on speech production rather than hearing. The results from the focus group were in agreement for a majority of items. Conclusions: The next step in validating the CPIB for individuals with hearing loss is a psychometric analysis on a large sample. Possible outcomes could be that the CPIB is considered valid in its entirety or the creation of a new questionnaire or a hearing loss-specific short form with a subset of items is necessary. M ost of the life roles in which we engage, such as at home, at work, and in social situations, require communication that involves a bidirectional transfer of information among people. The term communicative participation has been described as "taking part in life situations that involve an exchange of information, ideas, or feelings" (Eadie et al., 2006, p. 309). This term is based on the definition of participation from the World Health Organization (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF), which defines participation as involvement in life roles. Communication is considered a critical element of life participation by hearing loss experts and individuals with hearing loss (Granberg, Pronk, et al., 2014;Granberg, Swanepoel, Englund, Möller, & Danermark, 2014). According to the ICF and other biopsychosocial frameworks of health, the impact of a health condition on life participation is shaped by a combination of variables, including the nature and extent of physical injury or impairment, the characteristics of the individual, and the environmental context. In a similar manner, the impact that a communication disorder, such as hearing loss, has on a person's participation in life situations might depend on the severity of the hearing loss, the characteristics of that individual, and the listening conditions of the environment, among other issues. Audiologists who have a deep appreciation for how a client's hearing loss influences participation in real-life situations might be better able to meet the habilitation or rehabilitation needs of their clients via amplification, aural rehabilitation, counseling, or other avenues. To achieve these goals, however, clinicians and researchers need valid...

show abstract

Variables Associated With Communicative Participation After Head and Neck Cancer

Bolt

Eadie

Yorkston

et al. 2016

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Importance For patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), communication difficulties often create substantial barriers in daily life, affecting a person’s ability to return to work, establish or maintain relationships, or participate in everyday activities. Objective The purpose of this study is to examine variables significantly associated with communication in everyday activities, or “communicative participation,” in adult survivors of HNC. We hypothesized these variables would extend beyond overt communication symptoms. Design From 2008–2011, participants completed questionnaires about specific experiences and symptoms associated with their health and communication. Seventeen variables were considered in relation to communicative participation. Setting Data were collected from community-dwelling adult survivors of HNC. Participants completed questionnaires, in English, either online or using paper forms according to their preference. Participants One hundred ninety-seven adults (121 males, 76 females, average age = 61.5 years) participated, all at least 6 months post-treatment for HNC with no additional medical conditions affecting speech. Participants were recruited through support groups, professional email lists, and professional contacts. Main Outcome(s) and Measures Communicative participation and predictor variables were measured using a variety of validated patient-report scales and demographic information. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted with predictors entered using a backward stepwise regression procedure. Variables with regression coefficients significant at P < .05 were retained in the model. Results The final model contained 4 significant variables (R2 = 0.462): self-rated speech severity, cognitive function, laryngectomy status, and time since diagnosis. In sum, better communicative participation was associated with less severe speech and cognitive problems; together, these two variables accounted for 42.0% of the variance in the model. To a lesser extent, better communicative participation also was associated with not having undergone total laryngectomy surgery and longer time since diagnosis. Conclusions and Relevance These results suggest that communicative participation in adults with HNC is associated with self-rated speech severity, cognitive function, whether or not a person has undergone total laryngectomy, and time since diagnosis. Clinicians can use these results to inform their practice in pretreatment counseling, patient education, and rehabilitation for survivors of HNC.

show abstract

The Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB): Item Bank Calibration and Development of a Disorder-Generic Short Form

Cited by 196 publications

References 65 publications

Communication changes following non-glottic head and neck cancer management: The perspectives of survivors and carers

Communication changes following non-glottic head and neck cancer management: The perspectives of survivors and carers

Exploring the Relevance of Items in the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) for Individuals With Hearing Loss

Variables Associated With Communicative Participation After Head and Neck Cancer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About