2009
DOI: 10.1080/09672560903114875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The historical place of the ‘Friedman—Phelps’ expectations critique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Capital stock refers to the plant, property, equipment used in undertaking the productive works of the economy. It also comprises the growth of the social and physical infrastructure such as roads and electricity supply over time (Forder, 2010). From one period to the next, firms experience changing capital stocks and this is essential in determining the rates of employment in a country.…”
Section: Economic Growth and Unemploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Capital stock refers to the plant, property, equipment used in undertaking the productive works of the economy. It also comprises the growth of the social and physical infrastructure such as roads and electricity supply over time (Forder, 2010). From one period to the next, firms experience changing capital stocks and this is essential in determining the rates of employment in a country.…”
Section: Economic Growth and Unemploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From one period to the next, firms experience changing capital stocks and this is essential in determining the rates of employment in a country. Often, capital formation is a function of the capital stock of the previous years and an increase in the new stock (Forder, 2010). This is expressed as follows.…”
Section: Economic Growth and Unemploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other technical questions are considered by Anthony Santomero and John Seater (1978), not least those relating to their views on the proper way of modeling expectations. 14 The attribution of this idea to Friedman and Phelps is routine as well as conventional, but quite mistaken-see Forder (2010). The fact that the argument was well understood long before 1966 or 1968 is, of course, a further reason for questioning the received history of the Phillips curve.…”
Section: The Expectations Issue and The Theory Of The Phillips Curvementioning
confidence: 95%
“…(7) Como apontam Arestis e Sawyer (2002; Tcherneva (2008); Fontana (2009), entre outros. (8) Ver Blinder (2004), Solow (2005) e Forder (2007). (9) Como dito anteriormente, no modelo básico do NCM a política fiscal é pré-determinada (uma constante) ou representa um choque exógeno.…”
Section: A Política Fiscal No Pensamento Dominante E Os Indicadores Funclassified