1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1987.tb02618.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The histological diagnosis of cutaneous graft versus host disease: relationship of skin changes to marrow purging and other clinical variables

Abstract: Punch biopsies of skin were taken from allogeneic marrow recipients routinely before transplantation, at 14-22 and 90-107 d after grafting and in the event of a clinical rash. Three histological appearances were encountered: graft versus host disease (GvHD), epidermal abnormalities, and normal. Graft versus host disease was characterized by epidermal basal vacuolation, spongiosis and individual cell necrosis associated with mononuclear cell infiltration of the upper dermis and lower epidermis, while epidermal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The histological diagnosis of acute cutaneous GVHD was established when at least grade 2 acute GVHD changes were present, including basal vacuolar degeneration, spongiosis, dyskeratosis, and an infiltration of lymphocytes in the upper dermis and lower epidermis. 22,23 The cryostat sections of skin biopsies were stained with two monoclonal mouse antibodies to human CD4 and CD8 antigens (MT310 and DK25; Dako, Hamburg, Germany), using standard immunohistochemical examination by means of an alkaline phosphatase/anti-alkaline phosphatase technique to detect antibody binding.…”
Section: Gvhd Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The histological diagnosis of acute cutaneous GVHD was established when at least grade 2 acute GVHD changes were present, including basal vacuolar degeneration, spongiosis, dyskeratosis, and an infiltration of lymphocytes in the upper dermis and lower epidermis. 22,23 The cryostat sections of skin biopsies were stained with two monoclonal mouse antibodies to human CD4 and CD8 antigens (MT310 and DK25; Dako, Hamburg, Germany), using standard immunohistochemical examination by means of an alkaline phosphatase/anti-alkaline phosphatase technique to detect antibody binding.…”
Section: Gvhd Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,[19][20][21] The situation is further complicated by the fact that frequently there is a lack of correlation between clinical features and histologic findings. 16,17 For example, the skin in a clinically affected area may seem unremarkable histologically, or clincally uninvolved skin can display basal keratinocyte vacuolization and necrosis consistent with well-established GVHD. 17 Therefore, the diagnostic value of skin biopsies has been questioned.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, adnexal involvement in SJS/TEN seems to be restricted to infundibular epidermis and epithelia of acrosyringia, whereas in GVHD lower parts of the hair follicle and epithelia of sebaceous glands may be involved (figures 6B and 6C). [Elliott, et al, 1987] 3. Generalized bullous fixed drug eruption…”
Section: Histologymentioning
confidence: 99%