2000
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.136.6.717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Significance of Skin Biopsies in the Diagnosis and Management of Graft-vs-Host Disease in Early Postallogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
2
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
41
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…8 A recent retrospective analysis showed that skin biopsy specimen findings are poorly correlated with the clinical severity of rash suggestive of acute GVHD early after SCT. 9 This study found no significant difference between patients with positive biopsy specimen findings and those with negative biopsy specimen findings, either in the clinical severity of acute GVHD or in the likelihood of receiving treatment for GVHD. They found that the decision to treat suspected acute GVHD depended on clinical suspicion, not on biopsy specimen findings, and, therefore, suggested that skin biopsy has a limited role in the management of eruptions in the early period after SCT.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…8 A recent retrospective analysis showed that skin biopsy specimen findings are poorly correlated with the clinical severity of rash suggestive of acute GVHD early after SCT. 9 This study found no significant difference between patients with positive biopsy specimen findings and those with negative biopsy specimen findings, either in the clinical severity of acute GVHD or in the likelihood of receiving treatment for GVHD. They found that the decision to treat suspected acute GVHD depended on clinical suspicion, not on biopsy specimen findings, and, therefore, suggested that skin biopsy has a limited role in the management of eruptions in the early period after SCT.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…However, after allogeneic BMT similar aspects can be observed as cutaneous reactions to chemotherapy or radiotherapy, in the eruption of lymphocyte recovery, in adverse drug reactions, and even in some viral infections [1, 3, 4]. Recent studies also suggest a limited role of skin biopsy, since histologic findings are frequently insufficient to differentiate a viral or a hypersensitivity drug eruption from the rash of GvHD, and correlate poorly with the clinical severity or evolution [11, 12]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, as there are no pathognomonic histological features for GVHD, the value of a biopsy lies mainly in lending support to the clinical diagnosis of GVHD or exclusion of other diseases, depending on the clinical context. Importantly, the number of lymphocytes entering the epidermis and quantity of apoptotic keratinocytes did not prove useful as predictor of the severity of the clinical disease, in contrast to the predictive value of substantial increases in total bilirubin, diarrhea and extent of rash and overall clinical GVHD grade for potentially fatal outcome [82, 83]. Furthermore, skin biopsies of a rather unspecific rash that occurs in the early phase after transplantation have been shown to be of limited value in predicting the progression from rash (viral-induced, drug-induced or early acute GVHD) to overt acute GVHD grade 2–4 irrespective of the stem cell source (peripheral blood, bone marrow).…”
Section: Impact Of Histopathology In the Diagnosis And Prediction Of mentioning
confidence: 99%