Summary An antibody, 21 N, raised against a synthetic peptide from the predicted sequence of the c-erbB-2 protein has been used immunocytochemically in a retrospective study of formalin fixed paraffin embedded breast biopsies. Fourteen out of 103 infiltrating ductal carcinomas exhibited positive membrane staining. Fifty-four of these tumours had lymph node involvement of which nine contained stained cells. These were all cases where the primary tumour was positive. In this series there was no correlation between c-erbB-2 overexpression and lymph node status. In five of the positive cases studied there was an associated in situ component which was also positively stained. Ten out of 24 pure intraduct carcinomas showed membrane staining, but none of the 149 benign conditions studied, which included 22 radial scars and 13 cases of atypical ductal proliferation, demonstrated the pattern of staining associated with overexpression. It is concluded that the c-erbB-2 protein is overexpressed in a minority (-14%) of infiltrating ductal carcinomas and only in cells that are cytologically malignant. Overexpression of c-erbB-2 is considered in relation to pathogenesis.

No abstract

Punch biopsies of skin were taken from allogeneic marrow recipients routinely before transplantation, at 14-22 and 90-107 d after grafting and in the event of a clinical rash. Three histological appearances were encountered: graft versus host disease (GvHD), epidermal abnormalities, and normal. Graft versus host disease was characterized by epidermal basal vacuolation, spongiosis and individual cell necrosis associated with mononuclear cell infiltration of the upper dermis and lower epidermis, while epidermal abnormalities were identical to GvHD but without the mononuclear cell infiltrate. Graft versus host disease occurred only in patients receiving marrow unpurged of T-cells while epidermal abnormalities occurred with equal frequency in recipients of purged and unpurged marrow and were also noted in a high proportion of pre-transplant biopsies. Patients whose skin biopsies exhibited epidermal abnormalities showed no greater incidence of subsequent clinical or histological GvHD than those with normal biopsies. For these reasons, we conclude that epidermal abnormalities cannot be regarded as a minor manifestation of GvHD as has often been previously assumed. We also conclude that they cannot be regarded as the cause of a rash as, unlike GvHD, the incidence was not significantly different in patients with and without rashes. The cause of epidermal abnormalities is not entirely clear; cytotoxic drugs and irradiation appear to play a part but their occurrence in patients with previously normal post-transplant biopsies suggests that other factors may also be important. Some patients with strong clinical evidence of GvHD had negative biopsies; these should be regarded with caution especially within the first 24 h after the onset of a rash as the diagnostic histological picture may take time to develop. In some cases, GvHD was confined to pilosebaceous units; this seems to represent a minor form of the disease with only a limited capacity for progression. Dysplastic epidermal changes which have previously been attributed to the use of cyclosporin A were found with equal frequency in patients who did not receive this drug and must therefore have some other cause.