IntroductionNative Turkish ducks are raised primarily for meat, eggs, and feathers. Native duck genotypes have been extensively raised for many years on family farms in some regions of the country. However, since we have no statistical data on duck breeding potentials in Turkey, it is only known that there are very few small-scale duck farms raising ducks (1,2). Ducks are easily raised and they are hardy and less susceptible to many of the common poultry diseases such as leucosis, Marek's disease, infectious bronchitis, and other respiratory troubles (3,4).Ducks have been housed in 3 different systems. These are intensive, semi-intensive, and open range systems. The intensive system could either be the deep litter floor or the cage system. In these systems, similar to chicken housing systems, the ducks are kept in an enclosed room on litter with proper ventilation (5). There is not enough information about the effects of different housing systems, sex, and slaughter age on slaughter and carcass traits in native Turkish ducks. However, the best slaughter age for Pekin ducks has been accepted as 7 to 8 weeks (6). There is little research on the different housing systems for Pekin ducks in Turkey (7,8). No research has been conducted to demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of deep litter floor and cage systems on slaughter and carcass traits in native Turkish duck production.The purpose of this research was to determine the effects of different housing systems, sex, and slaughter age on slaughter and carcass traits of native Turkish ducks.
Materials and methodsThis study was carried out on the Kafkas University Research Farm. Animal materials included both male and female native Turkish ducks. In the present study, 133 one-day-old ducklings were placed in brooder batteries with 24 h of light. All ducklings were kept under the same conditions. Then the 1-day-old ducklings were transferred into a shelter run, with both sexes together. A total of 64 ducklings of similar weights were reared in the deep floor pens. About 8-10 cm of wood shavings was used as litter on the floor. The stocking density in the deep litter system was 4 ducklings per m 2 (9). A total of 69 ducklings of similar weights were reared in the cage system. Nine standard cages (1 m × 2 m × 85 cm) were used with a stocking rate of 7-8 ducks per cage (9). After the second week, the daily photoperiod consisted of 16 h of light and