2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Heidelberg foot measurement method: Development, description and assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

18
184
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
18
184
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the control group, the motion pattern of the hallux in the sagittal plane showed good face validity compared with data from other studies [19][20][21]. The best comparison was found with the data provided by Canseco et al [21] and Simon and co-workers [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the control group, the motion pattern of the hallux in the sagittal plane showed good face validity compared with data from other studies [19][20][21]. The best comparison was found with the data provided by Canseco et al [21] and Simon and co-workers [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Kinematic analysis of the foot has been challenging for many years, partially because of technological limitations and also due to the intrinsic complexity of the foot [16]. However, over the last decades several research groups have been able to develop three-dimensional multi-segment foot models (3-DMFM) [16][17][18][19][20]. This approach is thought to enhance the biomechanical understanding of the foot as it allows measuring the kinematical Gait & Posture 32 (2010) [102][103][104][105][106] Background: Hallux valgus is a very common foot deformity in modern societies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, motion on the lateral arch of the foot (calcaneus-cuboid-fifth metatarsal) has been shown to equal that of the more commonly reported medial arch [8,16] and thus warrants separate reporting. However, to date kinematic data for separate medial and lateral forefoot segments is limited to small samples (n < 12) [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Dysfunction of the first ray affects load transmission to the forefoot, possibly leading to mechanical breakdown of the bony structures and pathological conditions. 18-21 Moreover, the rearfoot, the midfoot, the first ray, and the hallux must be included to evaluate the windlass mechanism.Second, the proposed model does not require an extra reference frame to define the neutral reference position as described elsewhere, 6,7,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28] positioning of the subtalar joint (STJ) in neutral, 29,30 or X-rays to define neutral. 3,[31][32][33][34] These techniques are complex and time consuming and in some applications expose the patient to ionizing radiation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%