2011
DOI: 10.1002/jor.21570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A clinically applicable six‐segmented foot model

Abstract: We describe a multi-segmented foot model comprising lower leg, rearfoot, midfoot, lateral forefoot, medial forefoot, and hallux for routine use in a clinical setting. The Ghent Foot Model describes the kinematic patterns of functional units of the foot, especially the midfoot, to investigate patient populations where midfoot deformation or dysfunction is an important feature, for example, rheumatoid arthritis patients. Data were obtained from surface markers by a 6 camera motion capture system at 500 Hz. Ten h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
42
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the difference in joint motion between trials is notable, these results indicate that dorsiflexion and abduction should occur at the 1-MTP joint into late stance phase of gait (Figures 1 and 2). Consistent with data reported in these past gait trials [6,7], increasing amounts of dorsiflexion and abduction were expected in this study - where gait was simulated by posing the foot on a system of wedges (Figure 3). When interpreting these results, it is important to remember the participant’s foot was positioned the same for both sequences, so any difference in 1-MTP joint angles shows the effects of the rotation sequence and nothing else.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although the difference in joint motion between trials is notable, these results indicate that dorsiflexion and abduction should occur at the 1-MTP joint into late stance phase of gait (Figures 1 and 2). Consistent with data reported in these past gait trials [6,7], increasing amounts of dorsiflexion and abduction were expected in this study - where gait was simulated by posing the foot on a system of wedges (Figure 3). When interpreting these results, it is important to remember the participant’s foot was positioned the same for both sequences, so any difference in 1-MTP joint angles shows the effects of the rotation sequence and nothing else.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Marker data were filtered using a fourth order Butterworth low-pass filter at 15Hz, with 50 points reflected. Euler rotations (X-Y-Z, representing respectively dorsi-/plantar flexion, eversion/inversion, ab-/adduction) were used to calculate motion between the defined segments in the different planes [20]. Joint kinematics were calculated for the impact phase which was defined from touch down (TD) until maximal dorsiflexion in the ankle joint (maxDF).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Dixon et al used the Oxford foot model to study midfoot power generation in walking (9). De Mits et al had healthy subjects walk barefoot to analyze midfoot kinematics using the Ghent model, a six-segment foot model used by physical therapists and podiatrists (10). Another study examined midfoot motion in high-and low-arched individuals during running (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%