The health impact of trade and investment agreements: a quantitative systematic review and network co-citation analysis

Abstract

BackgroundRegional trade agreements are major international policy instruments that shape macro-economic and political systems. There is widespread debate as to whether and how these agreements pose risks to public health. Here we perform a comprehensive systematic review of quantitative studies of the health impact of trade and investment agreements. We identified studies from searches in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Global Health Online. Research articles were eligible for inclusion if they were quantitative studies of the health impacts of trade and investment agreements or policy. We systematically reviewed study findings, evaluated quality using the Quality Assessment Tool from the Effective Public Health Practice Project, and performed network citation analysis to study disciplinary siloes.ResultsSeventeen quantitative studies met our inclusion criteria. There was consistent evidence that implementing trade agreements was associated with increased consumption of processed foods and sugar-sweetened beverages. Granting import licenses for patented drugs was associated with increased access to pharmaceuticals. Implementing trade agreements and associated policies was also correlated with higher cardiovascular disease incidence and higher Body Mass Index (BMI), whilst correlations with tobacco consumption, under-five mortality, maternal mortality, and life expectancy were inconclusive. Overall, the quality of studies is weak or moderately weak, and co-citation analysis revealed a relative isolation of public health from economics.ConclusionWe identified limitations in existing studies which preclude definitive conclusions of the health impacts of regional trade and investment agreements. Few address unobserved confounding, and many possible consequences and mechanisms linking trade and investment agreements to health remain poorly understood. Results from our co-citation analysis suggest scope for greater interdisciplinary collaboration. Notwithstanding these limitations, our results find evidence that trade agreements pose some significant health risks. Health protections in trade and investment treaties may mitigate these impacts.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12992-017-0240-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Impact of the North American Free Trade Agreement on high-fructose corn syrup supply in Canada: a natural experiment using synthetic control methods

“…specific potentially harmful foods, such as HFCS, which is linked to dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome (Box 1). 8,9,19,[51][52][53][54] Here we take advantage of an exceptional natural experiment in which tariffs on HFCS were withdrawn, within an existing system of free trade in goods, to study the effect of withdrawal of tariffs on HFCS products on consumption of the same in Canada.…”

Brief introduction of medical database and data mining technology in big data era

“…The research covers data on the health and nutritional status of Chinese residents at the individual level, family level, and community level. Since then, Chinese national health, nutrition, medical, economic, social and other research has provided more comprehensive data support 53 . The official website of CHNS covers the details of the research, and the website not only updates the number of studies dynamically.…”

Advancing progressive health policy to reduce NCDs amidst international commercial opposition: Tobacco standardised packaging in Australia

“…However, governments face fierce opposition from the tobacco, alcohol and food and beverage industries, which oppose these innovative, world first public health policies (Hiilamo, Crosbie, & Glantz, 2014; Yoon & Lam, 2013). In particular, these industries are increasingly turning to trade and investment agreements to prevent or slow the global diffusion of these policy innovations (Barlow, McKee, Basu, & Stuckler, 2017; Crosbie & Glantz, 2014). …”