2015
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The genetic diversity and structure of 18 sheep breeds exposed to isolation and selection

Abstract: The phylogenetic layout of the genotyped (30 microsatellite) 18 sheep breeds in this study demands and provides the opportunity to evaluate both neutral and adaptive components of genetic diversity in a naturally and artificially selected and subdivided sheep population. Seven Pramenka strains from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia characterized by a very low intensity of artificial selection, preserved the highest neutral genetic variability. Eight central and north-western European breeds under considerable… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, Suffolk and Dorset animals clustered closer to other US groups than to Suffolk from Australia and Ireland, or Dorset from Australia or the UK. This observation may be partially attributed to the differences in selection and breeding strategies and in production systems across the world (Andersson ; Ćurković et al ; Wang et al ). In addition, the difference between terminal breeds and wool breeds is clear, suggesting that there are genetic differences between breeds that have been selected for alternative production objectives and purposes (Blackburn et al ; Zhang et al ; Fariello et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, Suffolk and Dorset animals clustered closer to other US groups than to Suffolk from Australia and Ireland, or Dorset from Australia or the UK. This observation may be partially attributed to the differences in selection and breeding strategies and in production systems across the world (Andersson ; Ćurković et al ; Wang et al ). In addition, the difference between terminal breeds and wool breeds is clear, suggesting that there are genetic differences between breeds that have been selected for alternative production objectives and purposes (Blackburn et al ; Zhang et al ; Fariello et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All sheep of sample sets 2 and 3 were phenotyped for horn status at an age at which horns are usually developed. In general, the names of the sheep breeds mentioned in this article refer to Mason and Porter [ 3 ], except for the breeds Travnička Pramenka [ 4 ], Alpines Steinschaf and Cameroon sheep (dad.fao.org).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altamurana and Red Karaman, with females being strictly polled and males having or not having horns. Finally, there are some breeds in which the occurrence of horns varies both in males and females, for example in some strains of Steinschaf and of Pramenka such as Travnička Pramenka [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsatellites have been widely used to analyze the genetic diversity and population structure of many traditional cattle breeds, including European unselected breeds (MEDUGORAC et al, 2009), Croatian (KEROS et al, 2013), Slovenian (SIMČIĆ et al, 2008, Spanish (MARTIN-BURRIEL et al, 2007), Indonesian (SUTARNO et al, 2015), Latin-American (DELGADO et al, 2011), Indian (DEPIKA and SALAR, 2014) and Zebu cattle (HUSSEIN et al, 2015;CHAUDHARI et al,2009). This approach has also been successfully used to analyze the genetic diversity in other traditional livestock species, such sheep (ĆURKOVIĆ et al, 2016), dogs (DIMITRIJEVIĆ et al, 2013), horses (ACHMANN et al, 2004). Some genetically characterization of Busha from Bosnia and Herzegovina have already reported (ROGIĆ et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%