2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-008-1282-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The generality of nicotine as a reinforcer enhancer in rats: effects on responding maintained by primary and conditioned reinforcers and resistance to extinction

Abstract: Although there was a tendency for nicotine to increase low predrug response rates (i.e., response rates just prior to nicotine administration), 0.3 and 0.56 mg/kg nicotine systematically increased responding maintained by conditioned reinforcers. The results are consistent with a reinforcer-enhancing role of nicotine. However, nicotine did not increase resistance to extinction, nor did it increase food-maintained responses. Nicotine may selectively increase responding maintained by moderately reinforcing stimu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
47
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
8
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rate-dependent effects have been observed for many drugs, whereby the same dose of a drug can increase responding maintained at lower rates while not affecting behavior maintained at higher rates (Kelleher and Morse, 1968). While rate-dependent effects of varenicline have not been reported, rate dependent effects of nicotine (0.3 and 0.56 mg/kg) have been reported (Raiff and Dallery, 2008), and the present results are entirely consistent with this possibility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Rate-dependent effects have been observed for many drugs, whereby the same dose of a drug can increase responding maintained at lower rates while not affecting behavior maintained at higher rates (Kelleher and Morse, 1968). While rate-dependent effects of varenicline have not been reported, rate dependent effects of nicotine (0.3 and 0.56 mg/kg) have been reported (Raiff and Dallery, 2008), and the present results are entirely consistent with this possibility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The latter are frequently reinforcing in their own right (Stewart 1960;Stewart and Hurwitz 1958) and can also acquire secondary reinforcing properties (Cohen et al 2005;Palmatier et al 2007a). Nicotine increases the efficacy of a variety of primary and secondary nondrug reinforcers (Brunzell et al 2006;Chaudhri et al 2006c;Clarke and Kumar 1984;Olausson et al 2004a, c;Palmatier et al 2007a; Raiff and Dallery 2008), and in rodent self-administration studies, nicotine synergizes with drug-paired cues through a process termed "reinforcement enhancement" (Caggiula et al 2002(Caggiula et al , 2009Donny et al 2003). Both response-contingent and noncontingent administration of nicotine enhances responding for such stimuli (Caggiula et al 2009;Chaudhri et al 2006a, b;Donny et al 2003;Palmatier et al 2006Palmatier et al , 2007a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…drug cues) reinforcing effects (Caggiula et al, 2001;Corrigall, 1999;Fowler & Kenny, 2011), animal research indicates that nicotine may enhance the reinforcing value of rewards, especially sensory stimuli, that are independent of nicotine intake Donny et al, 2003;Olausson, Jentsch, & Taylor, 2004;Raiff & Dallery, 2008). Support in humans for this reinforcement enhancing effect of nicotine is suggestive but perhaps specific to reward type, dependence level, measure of reinforcement, or other procedural factors (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…visual stimuli) but not nonsensory (e.g. food) rewards Raiff & Dallery, 2008). We also related reinforced responding to craving and withdrawal to examine potential associations with symptoms of abstinence (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%