2013
DOI: 10.1111/acer.12085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Varenicline on Ethanol- and Food-Maintained Responding in a Concurrent Access Procedure

Abstract: Background Varenicline has been reported to reduce drinking in smokers, and to selectively decrease responding for ethanol versus alternatives in preclinical studies. Such selectivity may reflect potential therapeutic effects and the involvement of nicotinic receptors in ethanol reinforcement. However, these studies have been conducted with ethanol and an alternative available in isolation or in separate groups, and selectivity can depend on the context in which reinforcement occurs. Whether varenicline select… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
18
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously shown that AT-1001 does not impact responding for food at the doses used in the present study (Toll et al, 2012). Mecamylamine and varenicline have similarly been shown to have no impact on food responding at doses we found to significantly inhibit nicotine and CSE self-administration (Levin et al, 2000;Ginsburg and Lamb, 2013). Thus, the effects observed in this study are not likely because of a general decrease in activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…We have previously shown that AT-1001 does not impact responding for food at the doses used in the present study (Toll et al, 2012). Mecamylamine and varenicline have similarly been shown to have no impact on food responding at doses we found to significantly inhibit nicotine and CSE self-administration (Levin et al, 2000;Ginsburg and Lamb, 2013). Thus, the effects observed in this study are not likely because of a general decrease in activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…As detailed in Table 1, pretreatment with varenicline reduces nicotine self-administrationin pre-clinical models, (see Table 1; Chang et al , 2015; Costello et al , 2014; Funk et al , 2015; George et al , 2011; Goeders et al , 2012; Hall et al , 2015; Le Foll et al , 2012; Mello et al , 2014; O'Connor et al , 2010; Panlilio et al , 2015; Rollema et al , 2007; Scuppa et al , 2015; Wouda et al , 2011). Similarly, some studies have reported reduced intake of ethanol(see Table 2; Feduccia et al , 2014; Ginsburg and Lamb, 2013; Hendrickson et al , 2010; Kamens et al , 2010; Kaminski and Weerts, 2014; Randall et al , 2015; Sotomayor-Zárate et al , 2013; Steensland et al , 2007; Wouda et al , 2011). Interestingly, other published reports have either shown no effect on ethanol intake (Scuppa et al, 2015),or an increase in ethanol intake at certain doses (Ginsburg and Lamb, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Similarly, some studies have reported reduced intake of ethanol(see Table 2; Feduccia et al , 2014; Ginsburg and Lamb, 2013; Hendrickson et al , 2010; Kamens et al , 2010; Kaminski and Weerts, 2014; Randall et al , 2015; Sotomayor-Zárate et al , 2013; Steensland et al , 2007; Wouda et al , 2011). Interestingly, other published reports have either shown no effect on ethanol intake (Scuppa et al, 2015),or an increase in ethanol intake at certain doses (Ginsburg and Lamb, 2013). Pre-clinical research isalso mixed regarding the effects of varenicline on cocaine self-administration (see Table 3), with investigators reporting a decrease in intake (Guillem and Peoples, 2010), no effect on intake(Mello et al , 2014), oran increase in cocaine intake (Gould et al , 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, such selectivity appears to be be assay-dependent (Ginsburg et al, 2005; Ginsburg and Lamb, 2006, 2013). Further, many drugs that selectively reduce ethanol-maintained behavior in common preclinical assays fail or show limited effectiveness in the clinic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%