2021
DOI: 10.3390/nu13020518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “Fat but Fit” Paradigm and Bone Health in Young Adults: A Cluster Analysis

Abstract: The fat but fit paradox has suggested that obese individuals with good fitness levels have lower cardiometabolic risk compared to individuals with normal weight but lower fitness levels. This paradigm has not been explored in the context of bone health. The aim of this study was to test whether categories of fat but fit paradigm assessed by body fat percentage and handgrip strength holds up in young adults and to analyze the relationship between fat but fit categories and bone outcomes. Cluster cross-sectional… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(42 reference statements)
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the mediation analysis showed that the CRF/P1NP relationship was totally mediated by hsCRP levels, which reinforces the abovementioned protective role of CRF on the adverse effects of adiposity (Oktay et al, 2017). In this sense, Torres-Costoso et al (2021) have recently shown that fat individuals with high levels of CRF had a good bone health, probably due to its relationship on the decrease in fat mass and the ensuing inflammatory status (Torres-Costoso et al, 2015). Thus, this provides preliminary evidence for the hypothesis that hsCRP levels play an important role in the relationship between CRF and P1NP levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Additionally, the mediation analysis showed that the CRF/P1NP relationship was totally mediated by hsCRP levels, which reinforces the abovementioned protective role of CRF on the adverse effects of adiposity (Oktay et al, 2017). In this sense, Torres-Costoso et al (2021) have recently shown that fat individuals with high levels of CRF had a good bone health, probably due to its relationship on the decrease in fat mass and the ensuing inflammatory status (Torres-Costoso et al, 2015). Thus, this provides preliminary evidence for the hypothesis that hsCRP levels play an important role in the relationship between CRF and P1NP levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…It was discovered that BMD did not present unlimited reduction with non-trunk BFM increasing compared with a condition where trunk far increasing. Trunk fat presented a linear negative relationship with BMD in our study and this finding is persistent with a study of primarily small cohorts in which the majority 41–44 but not all 45 showed a negative relationship between central fat mass and BMD. These results reflected that limb fat might not be boundless proliferation, and limb fat sustained a protective effect on BMD to some extent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Physical fitness acquires special relevance in this regard because scores obtained in physical fitness tests during adolescence can predict health-related fitness in adulthood [ 20 ], with cardiorespiratory capacity, upper limb strength, speed, and flexibility being the physical capacities most valued in previous research conducted with adolescents due to their relationship with health [ 21 ]. So much so that research conducted in recent years has given rise to a phenomenon known as “fat but fit”, in which overweight or obese individuals, but with a high level of cardiorespiratory fitness or a good fitness level, have a lower risk of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases, regardless of their weight status [ 22 , 23 ], giving even more relevance to the practice of physical activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the “fat but fit” paradox, few studies have been carried out in adolescents, and these are observational studies that have used cardiorespiratory fitness or handgrip strength as variables to determine physical fitness [ 22 , 23 ]. However, part of the variability in fitness is explained by genetics and hormonal changes, so that adolescents who are not very active can present moderate levels of these variables, which is a factor to be taken into account when considering subjects as fit [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%