2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical, Psychological, and Body Composition Differences between Active and Sedentary Adolescents According to the “Fat but Fit” Paradigm

Abstract: The practice of physical activity during adolescence is essential for the proper development of the population. In recent decades, the relevance of physical activity has been increasing, due to the development of the “fat but fit” paradigm. This paradigm shows that adolescents with a high level of physical fitness are healthier than adolescents with poorer physical fitness, regardless of their weight, giving importance to sports practice over other aspects. However, few previous studies have analyzed the diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
2
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the comparison between AM vs. SM, and AF vs. SF, the results showed no significant differences between AM and SM, or between AF and SF, in the anthropometric variables analyzed. Previous research has shown contrary results, with differences found between active and inactive adolescents [ 74 ], which could be due to the fact that previous studies did not perform a separate analysis of AM and SM and AF and SF, so the introduction of males and females in the same comparison group, with the existing anthropometric differences between them [ 10 ], could be the reason for the discrepancy with respect to the present study. Regarding the absence of differences between active and sedentary adolescents in the anthropometric variables of the present investigation, a possible explanation could be that the COVID-19 pandemic led to an increase in weight and body fat of adolescents due to a positive energy balance, regardless of their previous level of physical activity [ 75 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Regarding the comparison between AM vs. SM, and AF vs. SF, the results showed no significant differences between AM and SM, or between AF and SF, in the anthropometric variables analyzed. Previous research has shown contrary results, with differences found between active and inactive adolescents [ 74 ], which could be due to the fact that previous studies did not perform a separate analysis of AM and SM and AF and SF, so the introduction of males and females in the same comparison group, with the existing anthropometric differences between them [ 10 ], could be the reason for the discrepancy with respect to the present study. Regarding the absence of differences between active and sedentary adolescents in the anthropometric variables of the present investigation, a possible explanation could be that the COVID-19 pandemic led to an increase in weight and body fat of adolescents due to a positive energy balance, regardless of their previous level of physical activity [ 75 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…However, these positive results in active versus inactive adolescents occurred only in adolescents with NIA and OA to the MD, but not in those with PA, where only differences in VO2max were found. Previous research showed similar results for VO2max where differences were found when considering the level of physical activity, regardless of gender, age, weight, or maturational status [42]. The present research provides new information in this respect, showing that active adolescents show higher VO2max, regardless of their AMD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Based on previous research, a generic warm-up was performed that included 5 min of progressive running and 10 min of joint mobility of the main joints involved in the physical fitness tests [ 42 ]. The warm-up ended with a more specific part corresponding to the familiarization of the adolescents with the handgrip strength, CMJ, and 20-m sprint tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Mateo-Orcajada study, participants aged 12–16 years ( n = 791) compared anthropometric characteristics including body composition of physically active and inactive individuals. As in our study, significant differences were noted in almost every indicator between the active and inactive groups ( 29 ). The study by Baran et al evaluated children aged 6–17 years ( n = 69).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%