1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00108-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Equivalence of SF-36 Summary Health Scores Estimated Using Standard and Country-Specific Algorithms in 10 Countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
392
6
21

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 526 publications
(429 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
10
392
6
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Once using the standardized approach, orthogonal rotation (varimax), which by definition assumes factors to be uncorrelated, and once using an approach, oblique rotation (promax), which by definition allows factors to be correlated. The SF-36 summary measures manual [18] and various papers show that, when using the orthogonal method, the mental and physical component summaries demonstrate low to very low empirical correlations [19,20]. Papers that have used the oblique rotation method have reported high correlations between the mental and physical component summary scores [15,[21][22][23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once using the standardized approach, orthogonal rotation (varimax), which by definition assumes factors to be uncorrelated, and once using an approach, oblique rotation (promax), which by definition allows factors to be correlated. The SF-36 summary measures manual [18] and various papers show that, when using the orthogonal method, the mental and physical component summaries demonstrate low to very low empirical correlations [19,20]. Papers that have used the oblique rotation method have reported high correlations between the mental and physical component summary scores [15,[21][22][23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is recommended to use norm-based scores (NBS) in order to make it easier to compare results between studies. 17 NBS transforms all the subscales to have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. SF-36 NBS was calculated using Quality Metrics software, which compares with US norms based on randomly selected adults matched for age.…”
Section: Qol Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…US norms are widely used enabling comparison between studies and countries and are recommended and validated for international publications. 17 SF-36v2 was licenced from Quality Metric, OPTUM Insight: QM020903.…”
Section: Qol Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here we followed the methodology used in the IQOLA project (Ware et al 1998b), where norm-based T scores are used to perform factor analysis estimating two summary measures: the physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS). IQOLA proposed to work in three steps, the first being translation to produce a survey form; the second, the scale construction estimating specific scoring algorithms and the third, the validation and interpretation of the results (Ware and Gandek 1998).…”
Section: Calculation Is Done As Followsmentioning
confidence: 99%