1957
DOI: 10.1007/bf02545873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The enumeration of proteolytic bacteria in foods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1959
1959
1965
1965

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The logarithmic average count of the surface plates was 2.3 x 108/g and that of the poured plates 1.7 x 108/g. Such a variation can always be expected between results of these two procedures applied to the same population because of the higher degree of disruption of chains and clusters of bacteria which occurs in the spread plate technique (Reed & Reed, 1948;Campbell & Konowalchuk, 1948;Mossel & Vendrig, 1956;Mossel & de Bruin, 1957;Badger BE Pankhurst, 1960).…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The logarithmic average count of the surface plates was 2.3 x 108/g and that of the poured plates 1.7 x 108/g. Such a variation can always be expected between results of these two procedures applied to the same population because of the higher degree of disruption of chains and clusters of bacteria which occurs in the spread plate technique (Reed & Reed, 1948;Campbell & Konowalchuk, 1948;Mossel & Vendrig, 1956;Mossel & de Bruin, 1957;Badger BE Pankhurst, 1960).…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gelatin liquefaction. The suspension of the strain used for the determination of its oxygen tolerance was streaked as a 4-cm straight line on freshly dried plates of a slight modification of Frazier's (1926) gelatin agar (Mossel and de Bruin, 1957). Six strains were tested per plate (9 cm diam).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%