1978
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-5288(18)33015-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The elimination of serum-resistant Escherichia coli from experimentally infected single mammary glands of healthy cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another indication that milk has a limited antibacterial efficiency is that it is easy to induce intramammary infections by introducing small numbers of microorganisms through the teat canal. It has been shown that if even very few (1–10 cfu) streptococci [30], staphylococci [31] or Escherichia coli [32] gain access to the teat cistern of uninflamed glands, bacterial multiplication takes place and infection ensues. When the defenses of the MG are compromised, it is common for the infecting bacteria to reach concentrations above 10 6 or 10 8 cfu/mL in milk [25, 29].…”
Section: Mammary Microbiota and The Innate Immunity Of The Mgmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another indication that milk has a limited antibacterial efficiency is that it is easy to induce intramammary infections by introducing small numbers of microorganisms through the teat canal. It has been shown that if even very few (1–10 cfu) streptococci [30], staphylococci [31] or Escherichia coli [32] gain access to the teat cistern of uninflamed glands, bacterial multiplication takes place and infection ensues. When the defenses of the MG are compromised, it is common for the infecting bacteria to reach concentrations above 10 6 or 10 8 cfu/mL in milk [25, 29].…”
Section: Mammary Microbiota and The Innate Immunity Of The Mgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although quite a few studies reported some protective effect by minor pathogens, others have found the converse or no effect, and several ancient and recent reviews conclude that a protective effect would be of low magnitude in any case [74–77]. It is noteworthy that the efficiency of the alleged intramammary microbiota would be low, since a few (1–100) S. aureus or E. coli cfu are enough to cause mastitis with a success rate above 90% [32, 78, 79]. …”
Section: An Implication Of Mammary Microbiota: Use Of Probiotics For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transmission between cows is rarely significant since in most herds clinical cases occur sporadically and are of short duration without a prolonged subclinical phase. During the most common form of coliform mastitis, namely a mild to acute clinical case, the coliform bacteria are frequently eliminated from the gland during the inflammatory process (83). This elimination of the invading bacteria occurs most frequently during late lactation.…”
Section: Coliformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work has demonstrated that S. uberis can adhere to, internalize and persist in mammary epithelial cells, and especially encapsulated strains, which can escape the recognitions by the host immune system due to the presence of their outer capsule (Tamilselvam et al 2006). Phagocytosis and killing of this pathogen by neutrophils (PMNs) has been shown to be ineffective in the prevention of infection, while phagocytosis of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus by bovine PMNs has been well documented (Hill et al 1978; Barrio et al 2003;Field et al 2003). Thus, a better understanding of the immune response within the mammary gland following S. uberis infection is the first step in formulating effective control programs for this disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%