2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-22646-6_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Robot Voice and Gesture Types on the Perceived Robot Personalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Failure e.g., natural dialogue negatively affects prospect interactions (Schramm et al, 2020 ). Moreover, HRI research showed that the attribution of personality traits like extroversion or dominance to the robot can serve as predictors of their social acceptance (Woods et al, 2005 ; Mileounis et al, 2015 ; Dou et al, 2019 ; Tanevska et al, 2019 ; Mou et al, 2020 ). Based on the similarity-complementary hypothesis, it remains inconclusive whether humans do prefer robots with similar personality characteristics or not (Esterwood et al, 2021 ) and whether the personality preference is task-dependent (Joosse et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Motivation and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure e.g., natural dialogue negatively affects prospect interactions (Schramm et al, 2020 ). Moreover, HRI research showed that the attribution of personality traits like extroversion or dominance to the robot can serve as predictors of their social acceptance (Woods et al, 2005 ; Mileounis et al, 2015 ; Dou et al, 2019 ; Tanevska et al, 2019 ; Mou et al, 2020 ). Based on the similarity-complementary hypothesis, it remains inconclusive whether humans do prefer robots with similar personality characteristics or not (Esterwood et al, 2021 ) and whether the personality preference is task-dependent (Joosse et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Motivation and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Tone refers to the waveform of the sound wave itself. The sound waves, which are generated by the vibration of different sounding bodies, are different.Human voice is more complicated than sound, because human voice comes from the vibration of vocal cords to drive air to resonate in the chest cavity, abdominal cavity and skull, and then it will be affected by the shape of the nose and lips during the output process Interference [9].Previous researchers, on the one hand, asked the vocalist to pronounce normally when receiving vocal research samples, on the other hand, they used Fundamental frequency (F0), also known as fundamental frequency, to describe the vocal frequency [10].The fundamental frequency refers to the lowest frequency of the composite wave formed by human voice in vocalization, which can be measured by using spectrum analysis software [11] [12].It is the current voice that is the most commonly used by research indicators in the study of acoustics.…”
Section: Sound and Vocal Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tay et al [4] defined fast speech rate = 216 words per minute and slow speech rate = 184 words per minute in a previous study. Dou et al [12] defined Female frequency = 228.49Hz; male frequency = 133.55Hz. Based on the above research, this study uses Adobe Audition CC to control the fundamental frequency and speech rate [29].…”
Section: Voice Sample Setting and Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When deploying robots in pub-lic and private locations, robots need to be able to provide natural services. Manipulating appearances, facial expressions, voices and gestures can improve the service quality of robots and improve their social acceptability [4]. Previous researchers suggested that humans could communicate easily with robots that have physical features similar to humans, such as arms and a head [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%