2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2016.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of rice-straw biochar addition on nitrification activity and nitrous oxide emissions in two Oxisols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numbers in brackets are standard error of the mean (n = 4) and lowercase letters indicate significant differences between the treatments at 95% confidence level WFPS -soil water filled pore space. There was a clear response of the observed N 2 O concentrations to the apple-tree biochar amendment rate and, compared to the CK treatment, ΔN 2 O in air/injected N 2 O was reduced to 5%, corroborating the results of other laboratory and short-term field investigations (Rogovska et al, 2011;Case et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2013;Lan et al, 2015;He et al, 2016;Grutzmacher et al, 2018). Although the previous studies observed a suppression of N 2 O by biochar in the soil, the underlying abiotic mechanism remained poorly understood.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Numbers in brackets are standard error of the mean (n = 4) and lowercase letters indicate significant differences between the treatments at 95% confidence level WFPS -soil water filled pore space. There was a clear response of the observed N 2 O concentrations to the apple-tree biochar amendment rate and, compared to the CK treatment, ΔN 2 O in air/injected N 2 O was reduced to 5%, corroborating the results of other laboratory and short-term field investigations (Rogovska et al, 2011;Case et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2013;Lan et al, 2015;He et al, 2016;Grutzmacher et al, 2018). Although the previous studies observed a suppression of N 2 O by biochar in the soil, the underlying abiotic mechanism remained poorly understood.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Apply conventional tillage lowered the stability of aggregate significantly. He et al (2016) reported that biochar may greatly influence aggregate stability due to its low bulk density. Frequent land cultivation may cause soil particles dispersed and creation of soil aggregate that a function of biological activity and time is disturbed (Herath et al, 2013).…”
Section: Results and Discussion Soil Aggregate Stability Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biochar is not an organic fertilizer, because it cannot add nutrients but it has a high affinity for nutrients and persistent in the soil as well as increase cation exchange capacity (Barrow 2012). He et al (2016) found biochar amendment increased soil nitrification activity in soils. Biochar may greatly improve soil structure and aeration due to its high porosity and low bulk density (Joseph et al, 2010), thereby providing favorable condition for nitrification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interactions between biochar and SOM, soil pH, soil texture, fertilization, and soil moisture on mineral N dynamics and N 2 O efflux can help inform the mechanisms by which biochar impacts N 2 O efflux. Hypotheses for biochar's ability to reduce N 2 O include effects on nitrification and denitrification rates (Wang et al ., ; He et al ., ), sorption of mineral N to the biochar (Sohi et al ., ; Case et al ., ; van Zwieten et al ., ) and impacts on soil aeration (Rogovska et al ., ; Augustenborg et al ., ; Mukherjee et al ., ). These incubations explored such hypotheses by looking at impacts on mineral N dynamics and the resulting N 2 O efflux across treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%