1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-835x.1990.tb00855.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of overt and covert rehearsal on the emergence of the phonological similarity effect in 5‐year‐old children

Abstract: It has been found that adults show better recall of lists of phonologically dissimilar words than lists of phonologically similar words with visual presentation. This phonological similarity effect is usually attributed to the use of covert verbal rehearsal. Previous studies, however, have shown that 5‐year‐old children do not show this effect with purely visual presentation. In the present study, 5‐year‐olds were trained to carry out either overt or covert verbal rehearsal. Both groups showed significant effe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a fmal study Hulme and Mackenzie showed that training children with severe learning difficulties to rehearse resulted in modest improvement in their memory span and an increase in their sensitivity to acoustic similarity. These effects are similar to the effects of rehearsal training in 5-year-old normal children (Johnston &: Conning, 1990). However, the increases in memoiy span obtained by Hulme and Mackenzie were small and they were only significant for materials that had been trained directly; they did not generalise to a digit-span test.…”
Section: Memory Span Dmelopment In Severe Learning Dijjiiul I Iessupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In a fmal study Hulme and Mackenzie showed that training children with severe learning difficulties to rehearse resulted in modest improvement in their memory span and an increase in their sensitivity to acoustic similarity. These effects are similar to the effects of rehearsal training in 5-year-old normal children (Johnston &: Conning, 1990). However, the increases in memoiy span obtained by Hulme and Mackenzie were small and they were only significant for materials that had been trained directly; they did not generalise to a digit-span test.…”
Section: Memory Span Dmelopment In Severe Learning Dijjiiul I Iessupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Although phonemic similarity effects are not thought to occur at output, support for this idea comes from a study by Henry (1991), who found that 5-year-olds did not show auditory phonemic similarity effects with probed recall, although they did with full verbal recall. However, Johnston and Conning (1990) found that 5-year-olds who were not instructed to rehearse when presented with pictures failed to show a phonemic similarity effect with full verbal recall. Given the evidence that the poor readers in the present study labeled the items at presentation, an alternative explanation is that this information entered the phonological store, where it would have become confused as the traces decayed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…While common practice in the field is to give children a pretest to confirm item familiarity (Halliday et al, 1990; Hitch et al, 1991, 1989; Palmer, 2000; Tam et al, 2010), here familiarity was tested at the end of the task to avoid priming the children to label the items during the task. Furthermore, all participants were asked to remain silent while performing the testing blocks to prevent overt labeling at encoding that could enhance representations for familiar items (e.g., Hitch et al, 1991; Johnston & Conning, 1990) but not for unfamiliar abstract shapes. Therefore, generating any language-based codes in addition to visual codes for one set of material over other, if any, would be mentally spontaneous and under situations where subvocal rehearsal was deemed highly unlikely.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…blocks to prevent overt labeling at encoding that could enhance representations for familiar items (e.g., Hitch et al, 1991;Johnston & Conning, 1990) but not for unfamiliar abstract shapes. Therefore, generating any language-based codes in addition to visual codes for one set of material over other, if any, would be mentally spontaneous and under situations where subvocal rehearsal was deemed highly unlikely.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%