1994
DOI: 10.1016/0168-1591(94)90054-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of modifying the amount of human contact on behavioural, physiological and production responses of laying hens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
1
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
55
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This confirms earlier findings in pig industry that stockpeople can have an effect on the growth rates, by their behaviour towards the animals [17,18]. According to researchers in this area [1,2,15,16], the reason for this…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This confirms earlier findings in pig industry that stockpeople can have an effect on the growth rates, by their behaviour towards the animals [17,18]. According to researchers in this area [1,2,15,16], the reason for this…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Studies in the pig and poultry industries, where the major inputs to the farms were similar, have demonstrated the importance of the stockperson's contact with animals on the behaviour, physiology and productive performance of these animals [2,17,18]. In pigs reared under experimental conditions, negative interactions, like hits, slaps or electrical shocks by a prodder, lead to an increased avoidance of humans [10,14,27], and elevated chronic corticosteroid levels [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other studies, no effects on weight gain have been found (pigs: Pearce et al 1989, Paterson andPearce 1992;chicks: Leonard and Fairfull 1992). The same results have been detected when interpreting the effects of handling on the level of stress (pigs positive effect: Hemsworth et al 1987, Barnett et al 1994; pigs no effect: Barnett 1991, Paterson andPearce 1992). However, most of the experiments have succeeded in reducing fear reactions towards humans by handling procedures (pigs: Hemsworth et al 1987, Pearce et al 1989, Hemsworth and Barnett 1991, Paterson and Pearce 1992, Barnett et al 1994sheep: Hargreaves and Hutson 1990;silver foxes: Pedersen and Jeppesen 1990, Pedersen 1992.…”
Section: Early Handlingmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Jago et al (1999) demonstraram que bezerros que receberam leite de uma pessoa que não interagia se aproximavam mais facilmente de uma pessoa desconhecida que os que receberam leite sem intervenção humana, este tratamento parece ser ainda mais eficiente do que contatos "positivos" (acariciar, deixar chupar os dedos) fora do horário de alimentação, além disso, em aves, a presença visual regular de um tratador reduziu as respostas de evitação das aves em relação ao homem (Jones, 1993;Barnett et al, 1994).…”
Section: Relação Homem Versus Animalunclassified