The effectiveness of knowledge translation interventions for promoting evidence-informed decision-making among nurses in tertiary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

BackgroundNurses are increasingly expected to engage in evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) to improve client and system outcomes. Despite an improved awareness about EIDM, there is a lack of use of research evidence and understanding about the effectiveness of interventions to promote EIDM. This project aimed to discover if knowledge translation (KT) interventions directed to nurses in tertiary care are effective for improving EIDM knowledge, skills, behaviours, and, as a result, client outcomes. It also sought to understand contextual factors that affect the impact of such interventions.MethodsA systematic review funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PROSPERO registration: CRD42013003319) was conducted. Included studies examined the implementation of any KT intervention involving nurses in tertiary care to promote EIDM knowledge, skills, behaviours, and client outcomes or studies that examined contextual factors. Study designs included systematic reviews, quantitative, qualitative, and mixed method studies. The search included electronic databases and manual searching of published and unpublished literature to November 2012; key databases included MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Excerpta Medica (EMBASE). Two reviewers independently performed study selection, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction. Studies with quantitative data determined to be clinically homogeneous were synthesized using meta-analytic methods. Studies with quantitative data not appropriate for meta-analysis were synthesized narratively by outcome. Studies with qualitative data were synthesized by theme.ResultsOf the 44,648 citations screened, 30 citations met the inclusion criteria (18 quantitative, 10 qualitative, and 2 mixed methods studies). The quality of studies with quantitative data ranged from very low to high, and quality criteria was generally met for studies with qualitative data. No studies evaluated the impact on knowledge and skills; they primarily investigated the effectiveness of multifaceted KT strategies for promoting EIDM behaviours and improving client outcomes. Almost all studies included an educational component. A meta-analysis of two studies determined that a multifaceted intervention (educational meetings and use of a mentor) did not increase engagement in a range of EIDM behaviours [mean difference 2.7, 95 % CI (−1.7 to 7.1), I2 = 0 %]. Among the remaining studies, no definitive conclusions could be made about the relative effectiveness of the KT interventions due to variation of interventions and outcomes, as well as study limitations. Findings from studies with qualitative data identified the organizational, individual, and interpersonal factors, as well as characteristics of the innovation, that influence the success of implementation.ConclusionsKT interventions are being implemented and evaluated on nurses’ behaviour and client outcomes. This systematic review may inform the selection of KT interventions and outcomes among nurses in tertia...

Implementation Science and Employer Disability Practices: Embedding Implementation Factors in Research Designs

“…Lack of fidelity during initial implementation may lead to underestimation of efficacy of the intervention and weaken the strength of conclusions [66]. Assessment of fidelity to behavioural interventions that require direct human observation and judgment has proved a challenge [67, 68].…”

Three-Year Pre-Post Analysis of EBP Integration in a Magnet-Designated Community Hospital

“…Although great attention was given to education interventions in a meta‐analysis of two studies by Yost et al. (), educational meetings and mentorship did not increase engagement in EBP behaviors. Instead, according to this systematic review, organizational (Yost et al., ), individual, and interpersonal factors, plus the characteristics of the innovation were found to influence knowledge translation.…”

PYDSportNET: A knowledge translation project bridging gaps between research and practice in youth sport

“…There may also be scope to build capacity in sport organizations through educational interventions designed to promote knowledge translation skills (cf. Yost et al, 2015). While individual readers may not have the resources to carry out a program of the magnitude we present here, they may be able to use the framework lessons learned on smaller scale projects, such as working within a youth sport league.…”

“…There is some precedent for this. For example, a recent review showed that multi-faceted knowledge translation interventions that included an educational component improved client outcomes in nursing contexts (Yost et al, 2015). Ultimately, we will work toward developing some integrated knowledge translation training initiatives that include academics and stakeholders in sport learning together, which may also create opportunities to collaboratively develop future research questions (Greenwood & Abbott, 2001).…”