2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of surface modification of TiMg composite on the in-vitro degradation response, cell survival, adhesion, and proliferation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rough implant surfaces are more prone to osteosynthesis than smooth implant surfaces because rough implant surfaces exhibit higher osteogenic activity, such as cell adhesion, cell proliferation, and calcium nodule deposition . Surface roughness with an Ra value between 20 nm and 10 μm has been demonstrated in studies to substantially affect the biocompatibility of implant materials and the initial adherence of cells. , Furthermore, after chitosan modification, the contact angle of PEEK-CS was decreased. With a smaller contact angle, PEEK-CS is more hydrophilic than bare PEEK.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rough implant surfaces are more prone to osteosynthesis than smooth implant surfaces because rough implant surfaces exhibit higher osteogenic activity, such as cell adhesion, cell proliferation, and calcium nodule deposition . Surface roughness with an Ra value between 20 nm and 10 μm has been demonstrated in studies to substantially affect the biocompatibility of implant materials and the initial adherence of cells. , Furthermore, after chitosan modification, the contact angle of PEEK-CS was decreased. With a smaller contact angle, PEEK-CS is more hydrophilic than bare PEEK.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 Surface roughness with an Ra value between 20 nm and 10 μm has been demonstrated in studies to substantially affect the biocompatibility of implant materials and the initial adherence of cells. 44,45 Furthermore, after chitosan modification, the contact angle of PEEK-CS was decreased. With a smaller contact angle, PEEK-CS is more hydrophilic than bare PEEK.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 53 , 54 Substrate morphology significantly influences cell adhesion to the substrate and intercellular interactions, thereby regulating cell adhesion and arrangement behaviors. 55 First, nanographene is intrinsically nonflat and has nanoscale ripples and folds on the surface. The particular surface morphology of nanographene may be responsible for the adhesion of cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modified warm compaction method for producing of Ti and Ti composites was developed by Balog et al for the dental [20,33,34] and by Sugar et al for biomedical applications [35][36][37]. The Ti powder/ Ti composites were pre-compacted by cold isostatic pressing (CIP) at 200 MPa.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%