2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10842-012-0132-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of ‘State Aid’ on Market Shares: An Empirical Investigation in an EU Member State

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our data this is not the case as we find statistically significant effects of manufacturing aid already with contemporaneous values of our explanatory variables. The reason for the difference in results could be explained by the fact we are using sector-level data whereas Buts and Jegers (2013) undertake their analysis at the firm level. We nevertheless check the effects of state aid with lagged variables which are summarised in Table 6.…”
Section: Robustness Checksmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our data this is not the case as we find statistically significant effects of manufacturing aid already with contemporaneous values of our explanatory variables. The reason for the difference in results could be explained by the fact we are using sector-level data whereas Buts and Jegers (2013) undertake their analysis at the firm level. We nevertheless check the effects of state aid with lagged variables which are summarised in Table 6.…”
Section: Robustness Checksmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the context of industrial policy there is always the issue of the time lag between implementation of the respective support measure, here the provision of subsidies, and the date when the measure takes effect. For example, Buts and Jegers (2013) find that the positive effect of Belgian firms receiving state aid on their market share takes effect only with a lag of two years. In our data this is not the case as we find statistically significant effects of manufacturing aid already with contemporaneous values of our explanatory variables.…”
Section: Robustness Checksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 Buts and Jegers (2013) show that State aid results in higher market shares for the aid-receiving firms, as well as an increase in market concentration, using Belgian firm-level data between 2005 and 2008. Aghion et al (2015) include the growth objective in their analysis on industrial policy and competition and find evidence that sectoral policy instruments are associated with higher total factor productivity in a more competitive-friendly environment.…”
Section: Brief Overview Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, pro-business and pro-market policy may be inherently opposing to the extent that implementing both at the same time will cause the effectiveness of either policy to dwindle. Based on a study of Belgium firms, Buts and Jegers (2013) find a positive relation between subsidies (i.e. grants intended for investment in fixed assets) and firms' market share; this result implies that subsidies distort competition.…”
Section: Evidence and Theory On The Relation Between Industrial Policmentioning
confidence: 99%