1974
DOI: 10.1080/14640747408400413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Speaker's Voice on Word Recognition

Abstract: Although it is generally believed that the representational characteristics of verbal stimuli (typescript or speaker's voice, for example) persist for a very brief time in sensory memory, some recent studies suggest that such characteristics may persist much longer. The present experiments show that words are recognized faster and more accurately when they are re-presented in the same voice. This same-voice facilitation did not decline over a 2-min lag. Further experiments showed that subjects could recall the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
191
7

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
21
191
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability to discriminate between voices at a shorter (50-ms) and a longer (1,500-ms) ISI should also not be surprising given the work of Craik and Kirsner (1974), who found that voice details may persist in memory for 2-3 min (see Palmeri et al, 1993, for evidence that voice details persist for even longer amounts of time). In short, the results of Experiment 3 suggest that the failures to detect the change in voice in Experiments 1 and 2 were not due to the perceptual similarity of the two voices or to limits in memory for voice-related information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The ability to discriminate between voices at a shorter (50-ms) and a longer (1,500-ms) ISI should also not be surprising given the work of Craik and Kirsner (1974), who found that voice details may persist in memory for 2-3 min (see Palmeri et al, 1993, for evidence that voice details persist for even longer amounts of time). In short, the results of Experiment 3 suggest that the failures to detect the change in voice in Experiments 1 and 2 were not due to the perceptual similarity of the two voices or to limits in memory for voice-related information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Typically, recognition decreases as lag increases (Shepard & Teghtsoonian, 1961). The Palmeri et al (1993) study extended an earlier continuous-recognition study: Craik and Kirsner (1974) presented words to listeners in two voices (male and female). When repeated, half of the words switched voices.…”
Section: Memory For Words and Voicesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…EXPERIMENT 2 Craik and Kirsner (1974) reported that listeners not only recognized same-voice repetitions more reliably but could also explicitly judge whether repetitions were in the same voice as the original items. Like Craik and Kirsner, we were interested in our subjects' ability to explicitly judge such voice repetitions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%