1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3093(99)00417-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of pre-existing crystals on the crystallization kinetics of a soda–lime-silica glass. The courtyard phenomenon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, we observed a decrease in the crystal growth velocity with increasing heat treatment time or increasing crystallinity. The first EDS measurements indicated that the above-mentioned facts are caused by a difference in composition between glass and evolving solid solution crystals [16,17]. The formation of solid solutions is consistent with the phase diagram of a pseudo binary section CaO AE SiO 2 -Na 2 O AE SiO 2 [18].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, we observed a decrease in the crystal growth velocity with increasing heat treatment time or increasing crystallinity. The first EDS measurements indicated that the above-mentioned facts are caused by a difference in composition between glass and evolving solid solution crystals [16,17]. The formation of solid solutions is consistent with the phase diagram of a pseudo binary section CaO AE SiO 2 -Na 2 O AE SiO 2 [18].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…We have previously demonstrated that crystals grown in this stoichiometric glass at high temperatures dramatically hinder the formation of new crystals at low temperatures in their vicinity [16]. This effect was dubbed the ÔcourtyardÕ phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Changes in the ''groundmass,'' defined here as the matrix melt plus new crystallization in the form of microlites or growth rims on phenocrysts, are the focus of this study. We used lightly crushed material rather than a fine powder to minimize exposure of zoned phenocryst cores to melt and to limit the creation of additional crystal-melt surface area that could enhance crystal growth at the expense of nucleation [Fokin et al, 1999].…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small phenocryst fragments did not dissolve completely during 3-5 day runs at 900°C and 125 MPa, our determined preeruptive starting conditions. This introduces larger crystal melt boundaries than in the natural magma before ascent, which will enhance crystal growth at the expense of nucleation (Fokin et al 1999). Thus, preparation of starting material for decompression consisted of superheating the powder at 900°C and 200 MPa for 2-3 days, ensuring that most of the phenocryst fragments are dissolved.…”
Section: Decompression Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%