2002
DOI: 10.1029/2001jb000281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental study of the kinetics of decompression‐induced crystallization in silicic melt

Abstract: [1] Experiments were conducted to study the temporal evolution of feldspar crystallization kinetics during isothermal decompression. Pinatubo dacite was held at 780°C, 220 MPa, f O2 = NNO + 2, H 2 O-saturated conditions for an equilibration period, decompressed to final pressures, P f , ranging from 175 to 5 MPa, and then held for 0.3-931 hours. According to the plagioclase liquidus curve in P H2O -T space for the relevant melt composition, these decompressions impose effective undercoolings, ÁT eff , of 34-26… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

23
270
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 327 publications
(303 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
23
270
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…All of the experiments use the single-step method to reproduce the trachytic melt evolution in response to an instantaneously applied thermodynamic driving force (i.e., undercooling, ΔT = T liquidus − T experimental ). In our work, we have not attempted to distinguish between the effects of undercooling (ΔT) at constant pressure and effective undercooling (ΔT eff ), which is caused by decompression at constant temperature (Hammer and Rutherford 2002), because it has been shown by Shea and Hammer (2013) and Arzilli and Carroll (2013) that under the same final temperature and pressure, both processes appear to produce similar nucleation and growth rates. Furthermore, we performed decompression + cooling experiments, in which it is difficult to separate ΔT and ΔT eff .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the experiments use the single-step method to reproduce the trachytic melt evolution in response to an instantaneously applied thermodynamic driving force (i.e., undercooling, ΔT = T liquidus − T experimental ). In our work, we have not attempted to distinguish between the effects of undercooling (ΔT) at constant pressure and effective undercooling (ΔT eff ), which is caused by decompression at constant temperature (Hammer and Rutherford 2002), because it has been shown by Shea and Hammer (2013) and Arzilli and Carroll (2013) that under the same final temperature and pressure, both processes appear to produce similar nucleation and growth rates. Furthermore, we performed decompression + cooling experiments, in which it is difficult to separate ΔT and ΔT eff .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed petrological experiments 18,19,20 on a powdered pumice pyroclast over a range of -T conditions (Supplementary Information). Given the explosive nature of the eruption, and the lack of CO 2 in melt inclusions, we assumed that the pre-eruption magma was water-saturated, and added just enough water to the pumice powder to achieve water-saturation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From our results, extensive crystallisation due to nucleation-dominated crystal growth (e.g. Hammer and Rutherford, 2002), occurs at slightly higher pressures than significant (i.e., φ b > 0.3) bubble growth. Therefore, bubbles will begin to grow in an increasingly viscous melt-crystal suspension.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%