The Effect of Plyometric Training on Peroneal Latency

Henry, B.; McLoda, Todd A.; Docherty, Carrie L.; Schrader, John W.

doi:10.1123/jsr.19.3.288

Cited by 16 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this study, the mean peroneal latencies ranged from 88 to 102 msec and 86 to 91 msec in the non-dominant and dominant limbs, respectively. Although shorter peroneal reaction times (50-66 msec) in healthy ankles compared to our results were stated in a majority of the previous studies (10,28,31,32), the results of other studies (29,30) were quite comparable with our results. The mean anterior tibial latencies ranged from 95 to 105 msec and 90 to 101 msec in the non-dominant and dominant limbs, respectively.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

“…The present study exhibited partially consistent results with the previous studies for reaction times for the peroneal and tibialis anterior muscles (10,(28)(29)(30)(31). In this study, the mean peroneal latencies ranged from 88 to 102 msec and 86 to 91 msec in the non-dominant and dominant limbs, respectively.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

“…Therefore, evaluating these risk factors in healthy individuals is important to protect and rehabilitate the ankle. When healthy subjects are in question, the clinicians mostly prefer to evaluate or measure the strength, proprioceptive ability, or muscle latency of the dominant ankle (12)(13)(14). Recently, however, it was shown that the latency of the peroneus longus muscle was significantly different between the non-dominant and dominant ankles in healthy physically active individuals, with the dominant ankle having a longer latency than the non-dominant ankle (15).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Muscle Latency and Proprioception in Non-Dominant and Dominant Legs of Healthy Sedentary Individuals

Şekir¹,

Keleş²,

Gür³

2015

Turk J Phys Med Rehab

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The effects of lower extremity dominance on response latency and proprioceptive ability have been reported for physically active individuals, but not for sedentary individuals. The aim of this research was to explore the differences in muscle latency and proprioceptive ability between the non-dominant and dominant legs of healthy sedentary individuals. Material and Methods: Nineteen healthy male subjects without a history of any physical training practice for a minimum of 12 months were enrolled in this study. An ankle inversion tilting platform was used to measure the reaction times of the tibialis anterior and peroneus longus muscles. Joint position sense measured actively and passively and kinesthesia were used to evaluate proprioception of the ankle joint. Results: Neither the latency times of the tibialis anterior and peroneus longus muscles nor the proprioceptive ability score measurements exhibited significant differences between the non-dominant and dominant legs (p>0.05). Conclusion:The results of this investigation indicates that there is no side differences between the limbs with the evaluation of the peroneus longus or tibialis anterior muscle reaction times, ankle joint position sense, and ankle kinesthesia for healthy sedentary individuals.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Muscle Latency and Proprioception in Non-Dominant and Dominant Legs of Healthy Sedentary Individuals

Şekir¹,

Keleş²,

Gür³

2015

Turk J Phys Med Rehab

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Studies have examined a variety of interventions aimed to improve the reaction time (faster) of the peroneus longus in response to the ankle perturbation in an effort to decrease the likelihood of injury (Cordova et al, 2010;Han & Ricard, 2011;Henry et al, 2010;Ramanathan et al, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Consecutive ankle perturbations of three (Berg et al, 2007;Thain et al, 2015), five (Cordova et al, 2010;Henry 4 et al, 2010), six (Hopkins et al, 2006;Hopkins et al, 2007;Palmieri-Smith et al, 2009;Mitchell et al, 2008;Vaes et al, 2002), 10 (Han & Ricard, 2011Lynch et al, 1996) and 40 (Lynch et al, 1996) have been reported in the literature. The number of practice tilts is also selected heuristically, with some studies incorporating one practice trial before the main testing commences (Fernandes et al, 2000;Henry et al, 2010), others reporting 'several' trials (Berg et al, 2007;Hopkins et al, 2007), and others have no mention of practice at all (Ebig et al, 1997;Han & Ricard, 2011;Konradsen et al, 1997;Lynch et al, 1996;Mitchell et al, 2008;Palmieri-Smith et al, 2009). …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of repetitive ankle perturbations on muscle reaction time and muscle activity

Thain

Hughes

Mitchell

2016

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of a tilt platform to simulate a lateral ankle sprain and record muscle reaction time is a well-established procedure. However, a potential caveat is that repetitive ankle perturbation may cause a natural attenuation of the reflex latency and amplitude. This is an important area to investigate as many researchers examine the effect of an intervention on muscle reaction time. Muscle reaction time, peak and average amplitude of the peroneus longus and tibialis anterior in response to a simulated lateral ankle sprain (combined inversion and plantarflexion movement) were calculated in twenty-two physically active

show abstract

Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research: A Scoping Review

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recently, there has been a proliferation of published articles on the effect of plyometric jump training, including several review articles and meta-analyses. However, these types of research articles are generally of narrow scope. Furthermore, methodological limitations among studies (e.g., a lack of active/passive control groups) prevent the generalization of results, and these factors need to be addressed by researchers. On that basis, the aims of this scoping review were to (1) characterize the main elements of plyometric jump training studies (e.g., training protocols) and (2) provide future directions for research. From 648 potentially relevant articles, 242 were eligible for inclusion in this review. The main issues identified related to an insufficient number of studies conducted in females, youths, and individual sports (~ 24.0, ~ 37.0, and ~ 12.0% of overall studies, respectively); insufficient reporting of effect size values and training prescription (~ 34.0 and ~ 55.0% of overall studies, respectively); and studies missing an active/passive control group and randomization (~ 40.0 and ~ 20.0% of overall studies, respectively). Furthermore, plyometric jump training was often combined with other training methods and added to participants' daily training routines (~ 47.0 and ~ 39.0% of overall studies, respectively), thus distorting conclusions on its independent effects. Additionally, most studies lasted no longer than 7 weeks. In future, researchers are advised to conduct plyometric training studies of high methodological quality (e.g., randomized controlled trials). More research is needed in females, youth, and individual sports. Finally, the identification of specific dose-response relationships following plyometric training is needed to specifically tailor intervention programs, particularly in the long term.

show abstract

The Effect of Plyometric Training on Peroneal Latency

Abstract: Although latency measurements were consistent with previous studies, the plyometric training program did not cause significant change in the peroneus longus reaction time.

Cited by 16 publications

References 43 publications

Muscle Latency and Proprioception in Non-Dominant and Dominant Legs of Healthy Sedentary Individuals

Muscle Latency and Proprioception in Non-Dominant and Dominant Legs of Healthy Sedentary Individuals

The effect of repetitive ankle perturbations on muscle reaction time and muscle activity

Methodological Characteristics and Future Directions for Plyometric Jump Training Research: A Scoping Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About