2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2006.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of oxygen in Ru gate electrode on effective work function of Ru/HfO2 stack structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter value (cut off energy) was estimated to be 16.8 eV and it results in work functions of 4.4 eV. According to literature data [7,10], the work function of ruthenium ranges between 4.5 and 5.9 eV depending on the crystallographic direction, thus the obtained value is appropriate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter value (cut off energy) was estimated to be 16.8 eV and it results in work functions of 4.4 eV. According to literature data [7,10], the work function of ruthenium ranges between 4.5 and 5.9 eV depending on the crystallographic direction, thus the obtained value is appropriate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Electrical properties of ruthenium based contacts to n-GaN were investigated by measurement of I−V curves and the metal was found to be a good candidate for the high temperature applications [4][5][6][7]. Despite the above, there has still been a deficit of basic research on pure Ru layers on GaN substrates reported thus far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since RuO 2 has a higher work function (5.2 eV) than pure Ru (4.8 eV), 7,8 oxygen impurities in the films increased the EWF of the films. 71,72 It should be noted that the resistivities of the EA-ALD films were lower than that of control Ru despite the higher oxygen impurity concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The calculated EWFs of the DF-ALD films (D4) (4.79 eV) were larger than that of the control ALD film (4.56 eV), reaching that of bulk Ru (4.8 eV). This is attributed to the higher physical density and oxygen concentration of the DF-ALD film, as discussed above. …”
mentioning
confidence: 90%