2020
DOI: 10.5552/crojfe.2020.747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of New Silvicultural Trends on Mental Workload of Harvester Operators

Abstract: Close-to-nature (CTN) forestry offers many advantages, but makes management more complex and generally results in lower harvesting productivity and higher harvesting cost. While the higher harvesting cost of CTN is widely acknowledged, few ever consider the potential impact on operator workload, as the harvesting task becomes more complex. This study aimed to determine the mental workload of harvester operators under two silvicultural regimes: »pure conifer« stand and »mixwood« stand. In total, 13 harv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Respondents have varied levels of emotional involvement in completing the questionnaires and it is very difficult to account adequately for individual differences. Therefore, these methods are best used to supplement other objective measurement methods (Spinelli et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respondents have varied levels of emotional involvement in completing the questionnaires and it is very difficult to account adequately for individual differences. Therefore, these methods are best used to supplement other objective measurement methods (Spinelli et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the motor-manual alternative [9,46] the mechanized tree processing by double-grip machines seems to be far less demanding from the point of view of cardiovascular activity. This may be explained by the comfort provided by the machine's cab and by the sitting posture of the operator during the productive time, which could be double-checked by the findings on similar operations surveyed by simulation [20]. Motormanual and mechanized tree processing operations share a common biomechanical feature which is the use of manual labour either to handle the chainsaw or the controls of a given machine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been carried out in different parts of the world to check the performance of single-grip harvesters and processors in forest operations, with the aim to provide an informed ground on equipment capabilities as a baseline for its selection and use in operations, performance modelling and cost estimation [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Recently, important steps were taken to improve our understanding on the human-machine interaction [20], fine-scale performance of process mechanics [21] and human exposure to harmful factors [22]. However, mechanized tree processing at the landing was less addressed by scientific studies, and work organization and operational environment in such work places are different from those typically found in the forest stands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors pointed out that thinning young stands presents several dilemmas, including high operational costs, frequency of invasive trips involving various kinds of field machinery, tree damage [13,14], and mental stress on the harvester operator [15][16][17]. To improve its efficiency, new and more effective methods for harvesting are being sought [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%