2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2007.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of monetary policy on output in EMU3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
77
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
77
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers need to disentangle this effect, however, from the financial crisis experienced in Europe and the US. Furthermore, this may lead to business cycle de-synchronization Mohsin 2007, 2010 andRafiq andMallick 3 2008) or negatively affect the nexus between monetary and financial stability (Granville and Mallick 2009;Sousa 2010a;and Castro 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers need to disentangle this effect, however, from the financial crisis experienced in Europe and the US. Furthermore, this may lead to business cycle de-synchronization Mohsin 2007, 2010 andRafiq andMallick 3 2008) or negatively affect the nexus between monetary and financial stability (Granville and Mallick 2009;Sousa 2010a;and Castro 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the primary goal of monetary policy is to maintain a stable output gap and inflation. In developed countries, like the United States and major European countries, there is substantial evidence of the effectiveness of monetary policy innovations on real economic parameters, [12], [13], [14], and [15].…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the resulting model is set-identified and the approach therefore raises serious robustness concern as we discussed above, the common practice is to consider single-prior Bayesian inference in set-identified SVARs. The large body of the empirical literature adopting this approach includes Canova and Nicolo (2002), Faust (1998), Mountford (2005), Rafiq and Mallick (2008), Scholl and Uhlig (2008), Uhlig (2005), and Vargas-Silva (2008) for applications to monetary policy, Dedola and Neri (2007), Fujita (2011), andPeersman andStraub (2009) for applications to business cycle model, Mountford and Uhlig (2009) for applications to fiscal policy, Kilian and Murphy (2012) for applications to oil prices. Alternative approaches that do not suffer from the pitfalls of single-prior Bayesian inference are Moon, Schorfheide, and Granziera (2013) and Gafarov, Meier, and Montiel-Olea (2016a,b), who consider frequentist inference for the identified set and Giacomini and Kitagawa (2015), who propose a robust Bayesian approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%