2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2146947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiscal Policy Shocks and the Dynamics of Asset Prices: The South African Experience

Abstract: This study assesses how fiscal policy affects the dynamics of asset markets, using Bayesian vector autoregressive models. We use sign restrictions to identify government revenue and government spending shocks, while controlling for generic business cycle and monetary policy shocks. Using South African quarterly data from 1966:Q1 to 2011:Q2, we find that fiscal spending shocks affect stock prices more than house prices. Both spending and revenue shocks affect stock prices whereas only revenue shocks affect hous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, they find that financial shocks have a negative impact on house prices in economies with a large public sector. Examining the impact of financial shocks on asset prices in South Africa, Aye et al (2014) reach the conclusion that government expenditure shocks affect stock prices more than housing prices. Gupta et al (2014), in their study of South Africa using the timevarying parameter VAR (TVP-VAR) for government expenditure and house prices, reveal that unexpected government expenditure shocks have almost no effect on house prices, while expected government expenditure shocks increase housing prices.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they find that financial shocks have a negative impact on house prices in economies with a large public sector. Examining the impact of financial shocks on asset prices in South Africa, Aye et al (2014) reach the conclusion that government expenditure shocks affect stock prices more than housing prices. Gupta et al (2014), in their study of South Africa using the timevarying parameter VAR (TVP-VAR) for government expenditure and house prices, reveal that unexpected government expenditure shocks have almost no effect on house prices, while expected government expenditure shocks increase housing prices.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While research on the linkages between economic policy and asset markets typically focus on monetary policy (Simo‐Kengne et al provide a review), the zero lower bound on interest rates after the Great Recession precipitated a recent literature that analyzes the bidirectional effect of fiscal policy and asset prices (e.g., Jaeger and Schuknecht ; Afonso and Sousa ; Tagkalakis , ; Aye et al ; Agnello and Sousa ; Gupta et al ; El Montasser et al ; Liu et al ; Ruiz and Vargas‐Silva ; Mumtaz and Theodoridis ) . These papers generally conclude that bidirectional causality exists between fiscal policy and asset prices, with expansionary fiscal policy positively affecting asset prices and increases in asset prices resulting in contractionary fiscal policy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the quarterly data from 1966:Q1 to 2011:Q2 in South Africa is analyzed, the results confirm that fiscal spending shocks have a greater effect on stock prices than the house prices. By contrast, the revenue shocks are more influential than the spending shocks in case of the house prices in South Africa (Aye, Balcilar, et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, there are crucial studies, which focus on the connection between the variables that belong to macroeconomics, wealth and asset returns in the literature (Sousa 2010;Afonso and Sousa 2011). Aye, Balcilar, et al (2013) state that there are limited studies, which show the process of transmitting innovations of fiscal policy to asset markets. The studies generally focus on the European and the U.S. markets Sousa 2011, 2012;Agnello and Sousa 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%