The Effect of Discretionary Spending on Incumbent Victories in Elections

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This study aims to investigate the opportunistic behavior of local government heads in Indonesia using discretionary spending (grant spending, social assistance, and financial assistance) to win an election.
 Methodology: The study uses logistic regression on 133 samples of district/municipal governments in Indonesia prior to the election period.
 Main findings: The study finds no evidence that the average proportion and growth of discretionary expenditure affects the electability of incumbents in Indonesia’s local government head elections. That is, the use of discretionary spending is not sufficiently effective to attract sympathy from voters.
 Applications of the study: The results of the study provide inputs, especially for incumbents, to help focus more on performance, as it is proven that it leads to a higher probability of being re-elected, rather than the use of discretionary spending as an election-winning strategy. Government and NGOs should inform voters to be more cautious about the opportunistic behavior of their leaders.
 Novelty/originality of the study: Although some previous studies have examined the use of discretionary spending by incumbents, there has been little research, which provides evidence that such spending for political purposes can in fact help to win elections.

Bureaucratic Neutrality Index in Direct Regional Head Elections: Optimism in Developing Professional Bureaucracy in Indonesia

“…If the person who tempts the SCAs to violate neutrality is the incumbent regent, the challenge is harder, and bureaucratic neutrality potentially increases the risk of possible threat or harm to their career. In addition, the incumbent often uses regional budget allocation for election campaign purposes to ensure victory in the regional head election (Darmastuti & Setyaningrum, 2019).…”

Determinan Kinerja Anggaran pada Organisasi Perangkat Daerah

“…Kinerja anggaran menjadi fenomena yang dikaji dan didiskusikan oleh politisi, birokrat, dan pembuat kebijakan, terutama pemerintah pusat dalam melakukan pembinaan kepada pemerintah daerah (Rezeki & Hasanuddin, 2017;Negara, et al, 2018;Abdullah, et al, 2019). Pada beberapa negara, kinerja anggaran menjadi pertimbangan dalam memilih incumbent untuk menjabat kembali pada periode berikutnya melalui pemilihan umum (Yuliati, et al, 2017;Darmastuti & Setyaningrum, 2019).…”

Does Government Accounting Information Matter to Gain Votes? Evidence from Local Elections in Indonesia

“…As previously documented, infrastructure spending is a critical winning strategy because it has high visibility, from the voters' perspectives, and ultimately increases the incumbents' electability (Veiga & Veiga, 2007). Second is the practice of the massive manipulation of discretionary spending by local governments ahead of local elections (Setyawan & Setyorini, 2018;Darmastuti & Setyaningrum, 2019;Rahmanto et al, 2021). The incumbents rely on their authority in designing discretionary budgets (such as social assistance and grant spending) as a vote-winning strategy.…”