2016
DOI: 10.5334/pb.240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Corrective Feedback on Performance in Basic Cognitive Tasks: An Analysis of RT Components

Abstract: The current work examines the effect of trial-by-trial feedback about correct and error responding on performance in two basic cognitive tasks: a classic Stroop task (n = 40) and a color-word matching task (n = 30). Standard measures of both RT and accuracy were examined in addition to measures obtained from fitting the ex-Gaussian distributional model to the correct RTs. For both tasks, RTs were faster in blocks of trials with feedback than in blocks without feedback, but this difference was not significant. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This ratio will follow the same tendency as the ex-Gaussian skewness (c 1 = 2s 3 ∕ S 3 ). It has been described as a perceptual portion of an RT (Hohle, 1965), a decision component (Luce, 1986) and more recently, related to attentional factors, a defective effort control mechanism or attentional lapses (Gu, Gau, Tzang & Hsu, 2013;Moreno-Cid et al, 2015;Moret-Tatay et al, 2014;Moret-Tatay et al, 2016). In particular, Leth-Steensen, Elbaz & Douglas (2000) did find main differences in the s parameter, not in r or l, while comparing ADHD children to their age-matched control counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This ratio will follow the same tendency as the ex-Gaussian skewness (c 1 = 2s 3 ∕ S 3 ). It has been described as a perceptual portion of an RT (Hohle, 1965), a decision component (Luce, 1986) and more recently, related to attentional factors, a defective effort control mechanism or attentional lapses (Gu, Gau, Tzang & Hsu, 2013;Moreno-Cid et al, 2015;Moret-Tatay et al, 2014;Moret-Tatay et al, 2016). In particular, Leth-Steensen, Elbaz & Douglas (2000) did find main differences in the s parameter, not in r or l, while comparing ADHD children to their age-matched control counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One option is to perform a distributional analysis of the data. In the case of positively skewed data, an appealing possibility for this distribution is the ex-Gaussian distribution function (Balota & Yap, 2011;Lacouture & Cousineau, 2008;Luce, 1986;Moreno-Cid, Moret-Tatay, Irigaray et al, 2015;Moret-Tatay, Leth-Steensen, Irigaray et al, 2016;Moret-Tatay et al, 2014;Ratcliff and Murdock, 1976). Furthermore, this option can be a useful tool when dealing with high variability in the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of all three parameters, the most interesting one seems to be τ, since it has been assumed to contain a perceptual portion of an RT, the decision component, and it has been recently related to factors associated with attention. For a recent account on the relevance of these three parameters in the diagnosis of ADHD, see references [34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Mathematical Distribution Of Rtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RT distributions are asymmetric functions [4,5], which cannot be fully described by the mean and standard deviations [6]. The ex-Gaussian parameters obtained from fitting reaction time distributions to visual stimuli are interpretable in relation to cognitive disorders as certain correlations are evidenced to exist [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. This is the case of Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), the most usual diagnosed cognitive disorder in school-aged children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coefficient of determinationas a function of the dispersion of the SD of the Gaussian components (k = 3, 5). The points in the plot have been connected by means of RKHS interpolations[9,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%