2017
DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age slowing down in detection and visual discrimination under varying presentation times

Abstract: The reaction time has been described as a measure of perception, decision making, and other cognitive processes. The aim of this work is to examine age-related changes in executive functions in terms of demand load under varying presentation times. Two tasks were employed where a signal detection and a discrimination task were performed by young and older university students. Furthermore, a characterization of the response time distribution by an ex-Gaussian fit was carried out. The results indicated that the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(69 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We repeated the test after eliminating the outlier in the 12-year-old group and the result did not vary. These results are consistent with the findings on how reaction times evolve with age [38,[61][62][63][64]. A linear model was adjusted taking the logarithm of RT mean as the dependent variable, and age and sex as the fixed-effect factors, obtaining the same results: significant differences across ages 8 and 9 years (10% less RT mean, p-value = 0.01); 9 and 10 years (8% less, p-value = 0.05); 10 and 11 years (15% less, p-value < 0.01); and not between sexes (p-value for sex 0.82).…”
Section: Power-law Distribution Of the Nvgs' Degreessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We repeated the test after eliminating the outlier in the 12-year-old group and the result did not vary. These results are consistent with the findings on how reaction times evolve with age [38,[61][62][63][64]. A linear model was adjusted taking the logarithm of RT mean as the dependent variable, and age and sex as the fixed-effect factors, obtaining the same results: significant differences across ages 8 and 9 years (10% less RT mean, p-value = 0.01); 9 and 10 years (8% less, p-value = 0.05); 10 and 11 years (15% less, p-value < 0.01); and not between sexes (p-value for sex 0.82).…”
Section: Power-law Distribution Of the Nvgs' Degreessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It has been reported that a change in hippocampal volume and structure is observed with age-related decline in learning and memory ( Verbitsky et al, 2004 ; Arias-Cavieres et al, 2017 ; Bettio et al, 2017 ; Moret-Tatay et al, 2017 ). Additionally, in the aging hippocampus, neurobiological alterations have been clearly observed including those that alter intracellular signaling and gene expression, and cause neuroinflammation response ( Bettio et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in the aging hippocampus, neurobiological alterations have been clearly observed including those that alter intracellular signaling and gene expression, and cause neuroinflammation response ( Bettio et al, 2017 ). In recent years, studies regarding of the age-related hippocampus have focused on cognitive decline and impaired memory ( Arias-Cavieres et al, 2017 ; Bettio et al, 2017 ; Moret-Tatay et al, 2017 ). Several studies revealed the DEGs in hippocampus between young and the aging mice linked to the cognitive deficient ( Xiong et al, 2000 ; Cheng et al, 2007 ; Thomas et al, 2014 ), synaptic plasticity ( Dempsey and Ali, 2014 ) and various dysregulated pathways related to immune and inflammatory response ( Landel et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependent variable of interest is the reaction time, as this is considered to reflect the cognitive architecture, and not surprisingly, is a star variable in the literature [ 41 ]. However, the RTs (reaction times) are drawn from positively skewed distributions; for this reason, extreme data were trimmed, as in previous literature [ 42 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%