2018
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/448/1/012017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of conventional metal spinning parameters on the spun-part wall thickness variation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that for multi-pass conventional spinning, the reasonable roller trace design method can lead to lower thickness variation of spun parts. Similar results can be found in the following works [5][6][7][8]. To reduce the wall thickness variation, Xiao et al [9] claimed that the circumferential distribution of the wall thickness can be varied by changing the geometry of the roller pass circumferentially in synchronous multi-pass spinning.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…They found that for multi-pass conventional spinning, the reasonable roller trace design method can lead to lower thickness variation of spun parts. Similar results can be found in the following works [5][6][7][8]. To reduce the wall thickness variation, Xiao et al [9] claimed that the circumferential distribution of the wall thickness can be varied by changing the geometry of the roller pass circumferentially in synchronous multi-pass spinning.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…All measured heights achieve the higher values, up to the 38.404 mm. Hence, the application of concave tool path has a negative effect on the height of the spun part from the technological point of view, since in the previous research [32] was observed that concave tpp causes the most massive thickness reduction in the wall zone of the spun cups. This conclusion is also confirmed by research of Šugár [33].…”
Section: Fig 3 Spun Part Wall Heights For Convex Tool Path Profilementioning
confidence: 98%
“…For designs wherein the workpiece configuration was estimated by FEM, Metals 2020, 10, 793 2 of 10 the height and thickness of the workpiece, obtained due to the roller path, were evaluated [7][8][9][10][11]. Recently, stress distribution in workpieces was reported [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%