“…Adult cells or cell lines used for assessment of CGF are NHDF, HUVEC, HOB, Rat bone marrow cells, Schwann cells, SaOS-2, periosteal cells, and dental pulp cells (Table 3) Most studies stated improvement of tissue healing or regeneration in the presence of CGF, yet three studies investigating its effect on periimplantitis, implant stability, and immediate implants reported no significant difference or lower effect of CGF (Isler et al, 2018;Özveri Koyuncu, _ Içpınar Çelik, et al, 2019;Yang et al, 2015). Combination of CGF with stem cells or grafts resulted in better results than CGF alone Durmuslar et al, 2016;Honda et al, 2013;Kizilaslan et al, 2020;Qiao et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2017). Three studies compared CGF to other platelets concentrates; one study reported no significant difference between CGF, PRP, and PRF on bone formation in rabbit-skull defect (Kim et al, 2014), another study also confirmed no significant difference in GTR between A-PRF and CGF (Lei et al, 2019); while Park et al indicated better bone formation of CGF than PRF in femur defect of adult dogs (Park et al, 2016).…”