Die Discussion Papers dienen einer möglichst schnellen Verbreitung von neueren Forschungsarbeiten des ZEW. Die Beiträge liegen in alleiniger Verantwortung der Autoren und stellen nicht notwendigerweise die Meinung des ZEW dar.Discussion Papers are intended to make results of ZEW research promptly available to other economists in order to encourage discussion and suggestions for revisions. The authors are solely responsible for the contents which do not necessarily represent the opinion of the ZEW.Download this ZEW Discussion Paper from our ftp server:ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp0470.pdf
Non-technical SummaryThe number of decision makers in the Governing Council of the ECB increases significantly when new EU members join the European Monetary Union. Therefore, a reform is necessary to ensure the efficiency of the decision-making processes. The agreed reform proposal of the ECB is evaluated using different classification criteria to group the governors for asymmetric rotation and the assignment of voting power instead of voting weights to determine the influence the governors of different rotation groups would have on interest rate decisions.With a growing number of members in the ECB Council, the processes to decide about the interest will be more complex and take considerably more time if the decision-making process is the same as in the status quo. Furthermore, the difference between the economic and political weight will increase. Therefore, the ECB will switch to a rotation scheme if the number of members grows. E.g., if the number of central bank governors would be 25, three groups of governors are formed, where the first group of five members gets four votes, the second 13 members have eight votes and three votes are assigned to the third group of seven governors. Independently of the number of central bank governors in the Council, only 15 governors have voting rights. The members of the board have one vote as hitherto and the president decides in case of a tie.The rotation scheme is assessed, first, using different economic criteria for the classification of the governors into the different groups and, second, determining the voting power of the Council members using voting power indices, especially the Banzhaf measure and the Banzhaf index.We analyse how the composition of the three groups changes if not the index of the reform proposal is used but different economic criteria are applied. One possibility would be the synchronisation of the economic development of the countries. The more similar the economic development the more equal are the needs of the countries with regard to monetary policy. The economic development is described by an index calculated as the unweighed average of the inflation rate and the deviation of industrial production from its trend. It is shown that the grouping in terms of the correlation of the country-specific index with the average of the respective monetary union does not lead to a much different situation regarding the allocation of voting rights. Countries with lo...