2015
DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/edv010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dynamics of Political Support in Emerging Democracies: Evidence from a Natural Disaster in Peru

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The duration of the effects of one-shot events on political and democratic preferences has been found to be heterogeneous across case-studies (Rehman and Vanin, 2017), an in some cases only short-lived effects were found (Katz and Levin, 2016). The magnitude of the shock is likely to matter here: a shock that is large enough, such as the COVID, may generate a shift towards a new, self-reinforcing political equilibrium.…”
Section: Theory: Pandemics and Democratic Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The duration of the effects of one-shot events on political and democratic preferences has been found to be heterogeneous across case-studies (Rehman and Vanin, 2017), an in some cases only short-lived effects were found (Katz and Levin, 2016). The magnitude of the shock is likely to matter here: a shock that is large enough, such as the COVID, may generate a shift towards a new, self-reinforcing political equilibrium.…”
Section: Theory: Pandemics and Democratic Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signs of the parameters estimated in the homoscedastic model are informative as the sign determines the marginal effects for outcomes at the extreme of the distribution (not at all satisfied and very satisfied), but not for the intermediate outcomes (not very satisfied, don't know/not applicable and fairly satisfied). A brief first analysis of the table A3 shows that: (1) all the nationalities seem to be happier than Spanish; (2) females are happier than males; (3) larger households are less supportive than single households; (4) the children presence in the household does not affect the citizens' support; (5) marital status does not affect citizens' support; (6) education does not affect citizens' support; (7) Retired people are less supportive than unskilled manual worker; (8) Self-employed and unemployed citizens are a little bit less supportive than those who work full time; (9) the citizens who did not vote in the last EU election are less supportive than those who participated; (10) citizen who are less partisans of the national government are less supportive than those who are partisans; (11) the citizens who think that the economic damage is greater than the health benefits are less supportive than those who think the opposite; (12) the citizens who oppose more to any limitation of the individual freedoms are less supportive than those who favor the taken limitations; (13) who are less in favor of the use of trace apps to control the pandemic are less supportive than those who are in favor of the use; (14) the less concern citizens are about the own health, the more supportive are; (15) the concern about family and friends does not affect the support; (16) the citizens who have experienced some economic loss are less supportive than those who have not; (17) the citizens who have needed less help from other are less supportive than those who have needed help; (18) the attitude of helping others does not affect the support; (19) there is not a clear sign for the attitude of talking more to others during the pandemic; (20) and there is not either a trend for having participated in debates online about the measures taken by the government. In the heteroskedastic model (Table A4), the absolute magnitude of the estimated parameters is uninformative, and for that reason, the marginal effects of the determinants on the probability of the outcome of being very satisfied will be commented.…”
Section: Econometric Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La llamada "gripe española" provocó el distanciamiento social forzado que generó consecuencias negativas para la confianza entre las personas, promoviendo espacios para discursos populistas y sectarios que duraron décadas (Aassve et al, 2020). En la mayoría de los casos, los efectos psicológicos y sociales de la crisis son temporales (Katz y Levin, 2016); es la esperanza que tenemos hoy.…”
Section: Los Riesgos Democráticos Del Estado De Excepción Informalunclassified