The distribution of autistic traits across the autism spectrum: evidence for discontinuous dimensional subpopulations underlying the autism continuum

Abstract

Background A considerable amount of research has discussed whether autism and psychiatric/neurodevelopmental conditions in general are best described categorically or dimensionally. In recent years, finite mixture models have been increasingly applied to mixed populations of autistic and non-autistic individuals to answer this question. However, the use of such methods with mixed populations may not be appropriate for two reasons: First, subgroups within mixed populations are often skewed and thus violate mixture models assumptions, which are based on weighted sum of Gaussian distributions. Second, these analyses have, to our knowledge, been solely applied to enriched samples, where the prevalence of the clinical condition within the study sample far exceeds epidemiological estimates. Method We employed a dual Weibull mixture model to examine the distribution of the Autism Spectrum Quotient scores of a mixed sample of autistic and non-autistic adults ( N = 4717; autism = 811), as well as of a derived sample (from the enriched sample; N = 3973; autism = 67) that reflects the current prevalence of autism within the general population. Results In a mixed autistic and non-autistic population, our model provided a better description of the underlying structure of autistic traits than traditional finite Gaussian mixture models and performed well when applied to a sample that reflected the prevalence of autism in the general population. The model yielded results, which are consistent with predictions of current theories advocating for the co-existence of a mixed categorical and dimensional architecture within the autism spectrum. Conclusion The results provide insight into the continuum nature of the distribution of autistic traits, support the complementary role of both categorical and dimensional approaches to autism spectrum condition, and underscore the importance of analyzing samples that reflect the epidemiological prevalence of the condition. Owing to its flexibility to represent a wide variety of distributions, the Weibull distribution might be better suited for latent structure studies, within enriched and prevalence-true samples. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13229-019-0275-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

An Exploratory Study of a Dimensional Assessment of the Diagnostic Criteria for Autism

“…Consistent with Abu-Akel et al ( 2019 ) the significant correlations between both items and each item on the AQ10 suggests that the dimensional assessment of diagnostic criteria relates to the autistic-like traits assessed by the AQ10. Comparisons were made with the AQ10 as this is recommended as a screen for adults (without intellectual disability) by the UK’s NICE guidelines.…”

“…Abu-Akel et al ( 2019 ) recently proposed the co-existence of a mixed categorical and dimensional architecture within the autism spectrum, suggesting that dimensional and categorical classifications of autism need not be mutually exclusive and that higher autistic-like traits may reflect greater genetic liability for a formal diagnosis of autism. If dimensional and categorical classifications of autism are complementary, it should be possible to develop a dimensional assessment that directly reflects the diagnostic criteria for autism.…”

Annual Research Review: Looking back to look forward – changes in the concept of autism and implications for future research

“…Autistic trait measures such as the AQ show a smooth continuum between diagnosed autism and subclinical individual differences; there is a normal distribution of traits, rather than a bimodal distribution (although see Abu‐Akel et al, for a different modelling approach with large scale self‐report data that supports both dimensional and categorical conceptions). While it should be born in mind that the same behaviour can have different underpinnings, it does appear that, at the behavioural level at least, one can be ‘a bit autistic’.…”

A comprehensive psychometric analysis of autism‐spectrum quotient factor models using two large samples: Model recommendations and the influence of divergent traits on total‐scale scores

“…Should the difference in model fit between our undergraduate and general population samples exceed a certain threshold (Chen, 2007;Cheung & Rensvold, 2002), the model would not be considered measurement invariant as an individual's group membership substantially influences their AQ scores. In addition to testing whether the model fit was comparable between the two samples, model fit as a function of sex within each sample was also assessed given previous reports of sex differences in the distribution of autistic-like traits (Abu-Akel, Allison, Baron-Cohen, & Heinke, 2019;Baron-Cohen et al, 2001).…”