2019
DOI: 10.1002/aur.2198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive psychometric analysis of autism‐spectrum quotient factor models using two large samples: Model recommendations and the influence of divergent traits on total‐scale scores

Abstract: This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
57
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
10
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Autism Quotient, 86 a measure purporting to quantify autistic traits, includes subscales measuring distinct autistic traits that are weakly associated, suggesting the overall score of ''autistic traits'' lacks coherent meaning. 87 The term ''autistic traits'' is also rarely used to refer to autistic advantages or neutral charac-teristics, and therefore may offer a biased view of what constitutes ''autistic traits.'' A final example in this category is using ''typically developing'' or ''neurotypical'' to describe participants serving as a reference group.…”
Section: Concerns About Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Autism Quotient, 86 a measure purporting to quantify autistic traits, includes subscales measuring distinct autistic traits that are weakly associated, suggesting the overall score of ''autistic traits'' lacks coherent meaning. 87 The term ''autistic traits'' is also rarely used to refer to autistic advantages or neutral charac-teristics, and therefore may offer a biased view of what constitutes ''autistic traits.'' A final example in this category is using ''typically developing'' or ''neurotypical'' to describe participants serving as a reference group.…”
Section: Concerns About Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, as we did not include ASD subjects, we did not cover the full spectrum but nonclinical phenotype expressions and cannot infer to brain structural changes seen in ASD. This is relevant not only given some inconsistencies of AQ factor structure across populations [49]. Neither the latent structure of autistic-like traits (tapped by the AQ) [64] nor that of neurobiological features [65] are clarified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Koolschijn et al used the short version of the AQ (28 items), whereas we used the long version (50 items), making direct comparison between the studies limited. Furthermore, recent psychometric analysis of the AQ does not support the use of total-scale scores as there is strong evidence for divergence between the factors of the AQ [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, AQ scores do not correspond perfectly to diagnoses, with many autistic people scoring below the cut-off (Ashwood et al, 2016;Bishop & Seltzer, 2012), and no clear relationship between AQ scores and standard clinical measures (Bishop & Seltzer, 2012). It has also been suggested that the construct measured by the AQ is not continuous, as assumed, but instead categorical (James et al, 2016), making it difficult to interpret relationships (or lack thereof) with the total AQ score (see also English et al, 2020). Similarly, Agelink…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…van Rentergem et al (2019) reported that some of the items on the AQ function differently between autistic and non-autistic samples. While alternative scoring algorithms have been proposed to mitigate some of these challenges (Agelink van Rentergem et al, 2019;English et al, 2020), we were unable to use these as we did not have access to item-level data from all participants. Yet, despite the conceptual and methodological issues associated with the AQ, some studies have nonetheless reported relationships between AQ scores and prior information use in different tasks (Powell et al, 2016;Skewes et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%