2005
DOI: 10.1080/0144619042000287750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diffusion of innovations within a UKCI context: an explanatory framework

Abstract: The UK Construction Industry has been criticized for being slow to change and adopt innovations. The idiosyncrasies of participants, their roles in a social system and the contextual differences between sections of the UK Construction Industry are viewed as being paramount to explaining innovation diffusion within this context. Three innovation diffusion theories from outside construction management literature are introduced, Cohesion, Structural Equivalence and Thresholds. The relevance of each theory, in rel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three innovation diffusion theories for individuals and groups deciding to adopt an innovation has been studied (Harkola 1995;Larsen and Ballal 2005). Cohesion theory states that social proximity of previous and potential users influences the likely potential users' subsequent decision to use that technology (Harkola 1994, p21).…”
Section: Research On Technological Innovation Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three innovation diffusion theories for individuals and groups deciding to adopt an innovation has been studied (Harkola 1995;Larsen and Ballal 2005). Cohesion theory states that social proximity of previous and potential users influences the likely potential users' subsequent decision to use that technology (Harkola 1994, p21).…”
Section: Research On Technological Innovation Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of Emmanouilides and Davies [2007] indicate that social interaction directs the adoption process. Also Larsen and Ballal [2005] specify that informal networks influence diffusion. Nelson et al [2004] demonstrate that innovation adoption depends on how information regarding the performance of an innovation is generated and spread.…”
Section: Administrative Innovations and Their Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies (Blackley and Shepard, 1996;Toole, 1998;Cavell et al, 2004;Larsen and Ballal, 2005;Manley et al, 2005;Panuwatwanich et al, 2009) are conducted in developed countries, which have industry settings different from developing countries, for example Malaysia. Their findings and recommendations may not be directly applicable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%