2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ghir.2011.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of decision limits for the implementation of the GH-2000 detection methodology using current commercial insulin-like growth factor-I and amino-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen assays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because each immunoassay platform has different reference ranges for IGF-1, it is difficult to provide specific guidelines for GH disease management. For antidoping applications, serum concentrations of IGF-1 and the N-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen are used in combination to detect GH abuse (5)(6)(7)(8)(9). This use of these 2 biomarkers was recently implemented in the 2012 Olympic Games in London and will soon be adopted in all 33 World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)-accredited laboratories worldwide.…”
Section: © 2013 American Association For Clinical Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because each immunoassay platform has different reference ranges for IGF-1, it is difficult to provide specific guidelines for GH disease management. For antidoping applications, serum concentrations of IGF-1 and the N-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen are used in combination to detect GH abuse (5)(6)(7)(8)(9). This use of these 2 biomarkers was recently implemented in the 2012 Olympic Games in London and will soon be adopted in all 33 World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)-accredited laboratories worldwide.…”
Section: © 2013 American Association For Clinical Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GH-2000 score was initially developed using immunoassays that are no longer available [4, 5]. Although the original discriminant function has remained unchanged, the decision limits have been updated as further experience has been accumulated and new assays have become available [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primers and PCR cycling conditions for GH and rtTA are described above. Genomic DNA (40 μg) from F0 pigs was digested overnight with E co RI (MBI Fermentas), separated through a 1% agarose gel and alkali-transferred onto Hybond-N+ nylon membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, UK), as described previously61. Probes were PCR-amplified from pTTGH DNA fragments using validated GH and rtTA primers, pGH-SL (5′ - CACCAACCTTGGGCTTTGGG - 3′ , forward) and pGH-SR (5′ - CACGGCGTTGGCAAATAGGC - 3′ , reverse), rtTA-L (5′ - CTGTGCTCTCCTCTCACATC- 3′ , forward) and rtTA-R (5′ - GAATCGGTGGTAGGT GTCTC - 3′ , reverse), which were digoxigenin (Dig)-labeled using a nick translation system (Innogent-cn, Shenzhen, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood samples (3 to 4 ml each) were collected from each pig 3 times per day, before feeding (at 6:00, 12:00 and 18:00), on 3 separate days before and after DOX injection. Separate serum samples were used to measure IGF-1 levels (HY-082, Sino-UK institute of Biological Technology Beijing, China) and GH levels (HY-037, Sino-UK institute of Biological Technology, Beijing, China) via the radioimmunoassay (RIA) method, according to the manufacturer’s protocol61.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%