2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The development of a hard and soft IT governance assessment instrument

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only two frameworks were found covering hard and soft ITG: COBIT 5.0 in a holistic way and the MIG model in a more practical way. The MIG model was developed using design science to measure hard and soft ITG [34] because an ITG maturity model covering both parts of governance did not exist [14], [18], [35]. In this study, we applied the MIG model and the corresponding MIG assessment instrument [14], [36].…”
Section: Itg Maturitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only two frameworks were found covering hard and soft ITG: COBIT 5.0 in a holistic way and the MIG model in a more practical way. The MIG model was developed using design science to measure hard and soft ITG [34] because an ITG maturity model covering both parts of governance did not exist [14], [18], [35]. In this study, we applied the MIG model and the corresponding MIG assessment instrument [14], [36].…”
Section: Itg Maturitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. The design of the first version of the MIG assessment instrument was already published [34]. This paper describes the evaluation of the second and third version of the instrument.…”
Section: Design Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tata kelola TI juga dibahas pada sektor pemerintahan, rumah sakit, cloud computing dan penggunaan tata kelola TI oleh pakar/praktisi TI. (Suicimezov & Georgescu, 2014), (Prasad, Green, & Heales, 2014), (Prasad & Green, 2015), (Rebollo, Mellado, Fernández-Medina, & Mouratidis, 2015) Criteria Success Factor IT Governance (Alreemy et al, 2016), (Li, Chang, & Yen, 2017) Penerapan, dan atau evaluasi tata kelola dengan berbagai metode (COBIT dan Kombinasi Metode Lainnya, konseptual model) pada sektor bisnis (Aguillar, Murakami, Junior, & Jr., 2017), (Ibrahim & Nurpulaela, 2017), (Kosasi, Vedyanto, & Yuliani, 2017), (Lin & Wittmer, 2017), (Park, Lee, Daniel Lee, & Koo, 2017), (Sandfreni & Adikara, 2017), (Guetat & Dakhli, 2015), (Bermejo, Tonelli, Zambalde, Santos, & Zuppo, 2014), (Nuroğlu, 2016), (Wilkin, Couchman, Sohal, & Zutshi, 2016), (Thompson, Ekman, Selby, & Whitaker, 2014), (Fazlida & Said, 2015), (Ali, Green, & Robb, 2015), (Chi, Zhao, George, Li, & Zhai, 2017), (Smits & Van Hillegersberg, 2017), (Lunardi et al, 2014), (Bin-Abbas & Bakry, 2014), (Joshi, Bollen, Hassink, De Haes, & Van Grembergen, 2018), (Sirisomboonsuk, Gu, Cao, & Burns,…”
Section: Rq1 Apa Saja Penelitian Terkait Tata Kelola Ti?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penelitian (Ali et al, 2015) Terdapat solusi yang mudah dan simpel dengan menggunakan 9 fokus area dari model kematangan sebagai sebuah kerangka kerja (Smits & Van Hillegersberg, 2017). Menilai organisasi informal menggunakan area fokus yang sama seperti pada model kematangan tidak menambah kompleksitas dan diharapkan untuk memberikan informasi yang berguna pada konteks setiap area fokus dari Maturity IT Governance(MIG) model (Hard and soft governance).…”
Section: Tema 3: Penerapan Dan Atau Evaluasi Tata Kelola Dengan Berbaunclassified
“…It aids companies by aligning their IT assets and processes with their business objectives (Santos Castellanos, 2020). Previous research measured capability levels using the COBIT 2019 framework (Smits & Hillegersberg, 2017;Tantiono & Legowo, 2020). In other research, capability levels were assessed using the COBIT 2019 framework (Frogeri et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%