2004
DOI: 10.1080/09500690310001614000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The design and evaluation of a teaching–learning sequence addressing the solubility concept with Turkish secondary school students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our intention here is to do what others have proposed and use our findings to help teachers and researchers devise remedial teaching strategies. In support of such a statement, work such as that reported by Ebenezer (2001), Johnston and Scott (1991), Kabapınar et al (2004), Kaartinen and Kumpulainen (2002) and Taylor and Coll (1997) sought to lead teachers and researchers to design guide materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our intention here is to do what others have proposed and use our findings to help teachers and researchers devise remedial teaching strategies. In support of such a statement, work such as that reported by Ebenezer (2001), Johnston and Scott (1991), Kabapınar et al (2004), Kaartinen and Kumpulainen (2002) and Taylor and Coll (1997) sought to lead teachers and researchers to design guide materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, until now studies of students' understanding of solution chemistry have focused on some particular topics: the dissolution concept (Abraham et al, 1992(Abraham et al, , 1994Cosgrove & Osborne, 1981;Çalık & Ayas, 2005;Ebenezer & Erickson, 1996;Ebenezer & Gaskell, 1995;Longden, Black & Solomon, 1991;Prieto, Blanco & Rodriquez, 1989;Smith & Metz, 1996), the nature of solutions (Prieto et al, 1989;Fensham & Fensham, 1987), solubility (Ebenezer & Erickson, 1996;Gennaro, 1981), energy in solution processes (Ebenezer & Fraser, 2001;Liu, Ebenezer & Fraser, 2002), the effects of temperature and stirring to dissolution of solid into liquid (Blanco & Prieto, 1997), conservation of mass during dissolution process (Drıver & Russell, 1982;Holding, 1987), structural characteristics , types of solutions (named as unsaturated, saturated and supersaturated solution concepts), the concept of vapor pressure lowering, solubility of a gas in water and the relationship between vapor pressure and boiling point (Pınarbaşı & Canpolat, 2003). Research also has considered strategies to overcome alternative conceptions about solution chemistry (e.g., Ebenezer, 2001;Ebenezer & Gaskell, 1995;Johnson & Scott, 1991;Kabapınar, Leach & Scott, 2004;Kaartinen & Kumpulainen, 2002;Taylor & Coll, 1997). Pınarbaşı and Canpolat (2003) focused on types of solutions (unsaturated, saturated and supersaturated solutions), the concept of vapor pressure, solubility of a gas in water and the relationship between vapor pressure and boiling point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, students often describe the process of dissolving as melting or disappearing (Adadan & Savasci, 2012; Çalýk, Ayas, & Ebenezer, 2005) or do not recognize that filtering does not separate dissolved substances (Johnson & Tymms, 2011). Students also conceptualize substances in water from a macroscopic perspective, thinking of solutions as liquids mixed with small pieces of solids (Adadan & Savasci, 2012; Çalýk et al, 2005; Kabapinar, Leach, & Scott, 2004; Prieto, Blanco, & Rodriguez, 1989). Similarly, students have difficulty conceptualizing concentrations, considering only the amount of solute and not the amount of solvent (Adadan & Savasci, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Review Of Student Thinking About Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examination of the literature of the teaching and learning of "solubility" concepts results in identification of the following themes: (1) the solubility concept (Abraham, Grzybowski, Renner & Marek, 1992;Abraham, Williamson & Westbrook, 1994;Cosgrove & Osborne, 1981;Ebenezer & Ericson, 1996), (2) the nature of solutions (Fensham & Fensham, 1987;Prieto, Blanco & Rodriguez, 1989), (3) strategies to overcome alternative conceptions about solution chemistry (Ebenezer, 2001;Ebenezer & Gaskell, 1995;Johnson & Scott, 1991;Kabapınar, Leach & Scott, 2004;Taylor & Coll, 1997), (4) discovering alternative conceptions (Case & Fraser, 1999;Smith & Metz, 1996). These studies show that students have several alternative conceptions about solution chemistry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%