2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-005-1591-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cross-Age Study of Different Perspectives in Solution Chemistry from Junior to Senior High School

Abstract: This study reports on research examining what students think about aspects of solution chemistry and seeks to establish what alternative conceptions they hold in this area. To achieve this aim the researchers developed a test comprising of openended questions that evaluated students understanding of solution chemistry. The test was administered to 441 students selected randomly from different grades, grade 7 through grade 10. The research findings suggest that students have difficulty at comprehending the inve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
11

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
29
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of these classification criteria for student responses provides an opportunity to compare studentsú nderstanding to researchers (ÇALIK, 2005). Some researchers (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The use of these classification criteria for student responses provides an opportunity to compare studentsú nderstanding to researchers (ÇALIK, 2005). Some researchers (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers (e.g. ÇALIK, 2005;et al, 2011) used similar categories for examining students' understandings. Differences among group test scores were investigated by traditional statistical means using parametric tests: one-way ANOVA and Tukey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Research reveals that learners struggle to understand the concept of dissolution (Abraham, Gryzybowski, Renner & Marek, 1992;Abraham, Williamson & Westbrook, 1994;Cosgrove & Osborne, 1981;Ç alık & Ayas, 2005a;Ebenezer & Erickson, 1996;Longden, Black & Solomon, 1991;Smith & Metz, 1996), the nature of solutions (Fensham & Fensham, 1987;Prieto, Blanco & Rodriguez, 1989), solubility (Ebenezer & Erickson, 1996;Gennaro, 1981), energy changes during the solution processes (Ebenezer & Fraser, 2001;Liu, Ebenezer & Fraser, 2002), the effects of temperature and stirring on the dissolution of solids (Blanco & Prieto, 1997), the conservation of mass during dissolution (Dríver & Russell, 1982;Holding, 1987;Piaget & Inhelder, 1974), structural characteristics of solution chemistry , types of solutions Y unsaturated, saturated and supersaturated (Ç alık & Ayas, 2005b;Pınarbaşı & Canpolat, 2003), vapour pressure lowering and the relationship between vapour pressure and boiling point (Ç alık & Ayas, 2005b;Pınarbaşı & Canpolat, 2003), solutions and their components (Ç alık & Ayas, 2005c), and solubility of a gas in water (Pınarbaşı & Canpolat, 2003).…”
Section: Alternative Conceptions In Solution Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%