2016
DOI: 10.3847/0067-0049/225/1/6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Demographics of Galactic Bulges in the SDSS Database

Abstract: We present a new database of our two-dimensional bulge-disk decompositions for 14,233 galaxies drawn from SDSS DR12 in order to examine the properties of bulges residing in the local universe (0.005 < z < 0.05). We performed decompositions in g and r bands by utilizing the galfit software. The bulge colors and bulge-tototal ratios are found to be sensitive to the details in the decomposition technique, and hence we hereby provide full details of our method. The g − r colors of bulges derived are almost constan… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
9
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rms deviation in log (r e ) from the fitted relation (rms = 0.15) is larger than the one obtained by Bernardi et al (2003b) but similar to the K-band and B-band values of Falcón-Barroso et al (2002) and to the V-band value of Falcón-Barroso et al (2011), respectively. In literature there is a general agreement that the typical scatter of the FPR (rms 0.10) is independent of the photometric passband (Jorgensen et al 1996;La Barbera et al 2010;Kim et al 2016). But, it should be remarked that most works concentrate on ellipticals and lenticulars and adopt different fitting methods.…”
Section: Fundamental Planementioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The rms deviation in log (r e ) from the fitted relation (rms = 0.15) is larger than the one obtained by Bernardi et al (2003b) but similar to the K-band and B-band values of Falcón-Barroso et al (2002) and to the V-band value of Falcón-Barroso et al (2011), respectively. In literature there is a general agreement that the typical scatter of the FPR (rms 0.10) is independent of the photometric passband (Jorgensen et al 1996;La Barbera et al 2010;Kim et al 2016). But, it should be remarked that most works concentrate on ellipticals and lenticulars and adopt different fitting methods.…”
Section: Fundamental Planementioning
confidence: 75%
“…Moreover, we can infer that both ellipticals and bulges share the same properties when the FJR is used. The FJR down-bending highlighted in other works (Méndez-Abreu et al 2008a;Kim et al 2016) could be due to selection effects, when only high-or low-mass systems are considered. Indeed, the slope of the relation changes when galaxies with increasing values of absolute magnitudes are considered (Nigoche-Netro et al 2010).…”
Section: Faber-jackson Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a review of the behaviour of the profile and its quantities, see Graham & Driver (2005) and references therein. As has often been the case in comprehensive structural decomposition studies of well-resolved galaxies (Anderdakis et al 1995;Baggett et al 1998;Khosroshahi et al 2000;Graham 2001;Allen et al 2006;Gadotti 2009;Simard et al 2011;Meert et al 2015;Kim et al 2016;Lange et al 2016;Fischer et al 2018), we have chosen to fit galaxies with two models: (1) a single Sérsic model with free Sérsic index n and (2) a combination of a near-exponential disc (0.5 < n < 1.5) plus a Sérsic bulge component (n free). Although the underlying radial light profile of a rotationally-supported disc is expected to follow an exponentially-declining profile (n = 1), in reality, the effects of projection, asymmetries due to interactions or the otherwise diffuse structure of outer spiral arms can cause deviations away from a true exponential profile (Pohlen et al 2002;Erwin et al 2005).…”
Section: Galaxy Light Profile Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their SDSS composite images confirm that these bulges are indeed blue rather than an artefact of our model fitting. The tail of bulge colours out to excessively red (g −i) colours has a less clear explanation; values as high as (g − i) 1.5 mag do not appear physically plausible (Fernández Lorenzo et al 2014;Mendel et al 2014;Kim et al 2016). These bulges are still likely to be some of the most red objects in the sample but our ability to derive a meaningful quantity is severely lessened in the regime where the bulge magnitudes in the g-band are significantly fainter than in the i-band.…”
Section: Separating Galaxy Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%