2016
DOI: 10.4054/mpidr-wp-2016-012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The demographic transition revisited: a cohort perspective

Abstract: The principal focus of this paper is to analyze the fertility transition of the 19 th to early 21 st centuries with cohort fertility measures, and a discussion of key societal conditions shaping the transition. This new approach and procedure reveals that there were four different fertility transition pathways. Arguably equally important is the finding that thus far the demographic transition has not resulted in an equilibrium of relatively stable low mortality and stable low fertility. Early in the 21 st cent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
5
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…During the 1970s and 1980s, East Germany had a recovery in fertility while fertility continued to decline in West Germany, with a rapid convergence of fertility schedules after the collapse of the Berlin Wall. As reported in other studies (Frejka 2017;Sobotka, Skirbekk, and Philipov 2011), cohort fertility rates kept decreasing in East and West Germany and now appear to have stabilized below replacement level. Differences in fertility pathways between East and West Germany are largely attributed to disparities in socioeconomic conditions following the German reunification (Konietzka and Kreyenfeld 2002).…”
Section: Summary and Discussion Of The Main Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…During the 1970s and 1980s, East Germany had a recovery in fertility while fertility continued to decline in West Germany, with a rapid convergence of fertility schedules after the collapse of the Berlin Wall. As reported in other studies (Frejka 2017;Sobotka, Skirbekk, and Philipov 2011), cohort fertility rates kept decreasing in East and West Germany and now appear to have stabilized below replacement level. Differences in fertility pathways between East and West Germany are largely attributed to disparities in socioeconomic conditions following the German reunification (Konietzka and Kreyenfeld 2002).…”
Section: Summary and Discussion Of The Main Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The implication of the result that there are stronger differences between Continental/Scandinavian compared to Eastern/Southern European countries might suggest two venues for further research of context effects. First, fertility trends in the number and timing of children developed quite differently in these two country groups than in Continental Europe and Scandinavia which show similar trends as the Anglo-Saxon countries which are most researched for parenthood health effects (Tomka 2013;Freijka 2016). Second, Eastern and Southern European countries had political dictatorships after WWII, while Continental Europe and Scandinavia were democratic.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A impossibilidade de estimação do nível pré-transicional 11 Em uma perspectiva mais ampla da transição da fecundidade no Brasil, pode-se afirmar que o rejuvenescimento da curva de fecundidade fez parte da transição no país, especialmente entre 1991 e 2000 (BERQUÓ; CAVENAGHI, 2004). 12 Teoricamente, a melhor maneira para se discutir a transição da fecundidade seria a partir da análise da evolução da fecundidade de coortes sucessivas (FREJKA, 2017). No entanto, a imensa maioria dos trabalhos que procuram identificar o início da transição da fecundidade o faz a partir da evolução da fecundidade de período.…”
Section: A Estrutura Da Fecundidade Por Idadeunclassified