ABSTRACT:Injected foams obtained from blends with different compositions of isotactic polypropylene, iPP, and two different low density polyethylenes, LDPE, were analyzed by X-Ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry, and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis. Most of the results on the blends can be simulated as a weighed addition of the two pure components, indicating practical immiscibility. Some features about the crystallization of the iPP component pointed out inhibition and, consequently, a delay in the development of monoclinic crystalline entities.KEY WORDS Injected Foams / Polyethylene / Polypropylene / Immiscible Blends / Crystallization / Isotactic polypropylene, iPP, exhibits valuable properties and a very competitive price. Thus, this polymer is one of the most worldwide used commodity plastics. However, its poor low-temperature fracture toughness is a drawback so that it is often blended with elastomeric polymeric materials which improve very effectively the impact resistance of iPP (of course with some reduction of the modulus and strength). These iPP/elastomer systems are generally multiphasic, and optimum impact resistance is achieved by the proper particle size distribution of the dispersed (elastomeric) phase. 1 Accordingly, blends of iPP with poly(ethyleneco-propylene) (EPR), ethylene-propylene-diene terpolymer rubber (EPDM), poly(styrene-co-butadieneco-styrene) (SBS) and poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) (EVA) have been extensively analyzed and several mechanisms of impact toughening have been proposed. [1][2][3][4][5] The constituents of a blend and respective content are not unique variables for determining specific properties but the type of processing technique used has significant influence. Therefore, behavior of injection molded structural foams that show a sandwich-like architecture consisting of a cellular core surrounded by a relatively solid integral skin 6-13 does not have to be the same possessed by material obtained by compression molding since the morphological details developed might be rather different. Moreover, the formation of a sandwich-like structure depends upon processing conditions and techniques used. The gas-counter process by egression of foamed melt from the core of the molding is an attractive method for manufacturing structural foams. Gas-counter pressure controls skin thickness, density and structure of the cellular core which is affected by the amount of the polymer melt egressed. 6,7,9 Variation of distinct parameters during processing promotes the resulting structure derived within the skin or core. Therefore, two layers are observed in unfoamed skin: an outer amorphous layer and an inner one that is crystalline. Increase in the spherulites size is gradually observed. 10 Consequently, the crystalline core and spherulites are the largest in the foamed core. This more perfect crystalline structure is probably due to low heat conductivity caused by the gas-phase that keeps the temperature almost constant long enough for the growth of foamed spherulites....